ArticleCommunications medicine2025
A retrospective cross-sectional study showing wearable smartwatches enhance patient safety and efficiency in the intensive care unit.
Article in Communications medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Smart Cardiac ICU: Digital Integration, Predictive Analytics, and Perioperative Inflammation.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- The detection of cardiovascular biomarkers in dermal interstitial fluid - a step to real-time monitoring.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence-Driven Wearable and Connected Technology for Allergy: Real-Time Monitoring and Predictive Management for Personalized Care.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. In practice · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWearable smartwatches present a novel approach to continuous patient monitoring in ICU settings, with the potential to enhance patient safety and clinical efficiency.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional study evaluated the impact of smartwatch use on alarm response rates and clinical outcomes in a 27-bed ICU. Data were collected over two periods: pre-implementation (May 12, 2023, to July 11, 2023) and post-implementation (October 22, 2023, to December 22, 2023) of smartwatches worn by healthcare workers.
resultsOur findings indicate that the adoption of smartwatches significantly improves alarm response rates from 12.58% to 14.85% (p < 0.0001). In addition, the reduction in response time, fatal and high alert, medium alert, and low alert within 30 s response rates increased from 51.51%,70.42%, and 74.03% to 60.04%, 74.02%, and 76.71%, respectively (p < 0.0001), resulting in fewer high and fatal alerts. Moreover, the use of smartwatches is associated with reduced durations of mechanical ventilation and ICU stays, signifying improved clinical outcomes.
conclusionsWearable technology has the potential to simplify ICU operations, reduce alarm fatigue, and ultimately improve patient care and reduce adverse events.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.