ArticleBMC medical education2025
Application of augmented reality technology for obstetrics and gynecology teaching among undergraduates.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing cardio-obstetric care through digital health technologies: A narrative review.ESC heart failure · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe anatomy of the female reproductive system is the foundation of obstetrics and gynecology (OBGY) education. Augmented reality (AR) is now emerging information technology, which has been increasingly used in medical education of other disciplines. The present study aimed to evaluate whether AR-assisted learning mode could enhance the spatial comprehension and clinical thinking ability of undergraduates during the OBGY teaching.
methodsMedical undergraduates undergoing clinical studies were enrolled. Initially, all students received traditional classroom teaching with the textbook. Subsequently, they were directed to study identical curricular content through AR software in a self-guided online format. The value of AR technology for OBGY teaching was assessed via a self-report questionnaire following completion of AR-assisted learning.
resultsIn total, 285 valid questionnaires were collected. The AR-assisted learning mode was accepted by 99.30% students. Most students (98.60%) believed that AR-assisted learning can not only enhance their understanding of the 3D anatomy, but also help to cultivate their clinical thinking ability. Interestingly, compared with pre-class AR-assisted learning, more students accepted post-class learning (26.32% vs.73.68%). To our surprise, almost all students (98.95%) gave a positive evaluation of the AR-assisted learning mode in our study. Compared with the traditional teaching mode, we found that top advantages of AR-assisted learning mode were clearer, more intuitive and vivid (56.14%). Other perceived benefits included enhanced understanding of the spatial structure (9.47%), convenience and not limited by time and place (2.81%), and increased learning interest (2.11%).
conclusionsThis study is the first to demonstrate that AR technology is a valuable supplementary tool to be integrated into traditional OBGY teaching for medical undergraduates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.