ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
A novel EDA variant that causes X-linked hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in a Chinese family.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Prenatal sonographic clues suggestive of hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia in a fetus: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia (HED) is a rare genetic disorder that affects the development of the skin, hair, nails, teeth, and sweat glands. Due to its rarity, there are currently few methods that can be applied to facilitate its diagnosis during the prenatal period. Although a prenatal ultrasonographic examination will detect early signs of the disease, there are few reports on specific prenatal ultrasonographic features of ectodermal dysplasia. Genetic diagnosis can confirm the disease, but the numerous gene variants that cause ectodermal dysplasia have not been fully identified. CASE PRESENTATION: Our case was a multiparous woman carrying a single male fetus who underwent a fetal ultrasound examination at 23 weeks of gestation. The examination revealed thin alveolar bone, with no presence of hypoechoic tooth germ tissue in both the upper and lower alveolar bones. The seven-year-old male proband in this family manifested a clinical phenotype of sparse hair and underdeveloped teeth, and trio-based whole-exome sequencing (WES) performed on both parents and the proband revealed a novel and likely pathogenic variant of the EDA gene (NM_001399.4: c.806G > T, p.Gly269Val) associated with X-linked HED (XLHED; OMIM:305100). Based on the results of the fetal ultrasound examination and the results of the proband's genetic testing, the couple ultimately decided to terminate the pregnancy. The DNA of the fetal skin tissue after the induced abortion was extracted for Sanger sequencing, and it was confirmed that the fetus possessed ectodermal dysplasia generated by the afore-mentioned EDA gene mutation.
conclusionsOur study suggested that prenatal ultrasonography constituted an effective method for screening ectodermal dysplasia during pregnancy. In addition, our findings expanded the range of EDA variants in XLHED patients; and this discovery may now assist potential patients in receiving an accurate diagnosis, allowing them to make appropriate reproductive decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.