ArticleScientific reports2025
Medical application driven content based medical image retrieval system for enhanced analysis of X-ray images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
By carefully analyzing latent image properties, content-based image retrieval (CBIR) systems are able to recover pertinent images without relying on text descriptions, natural language tags, or keywords related to the image. This search procedure makes it quite easy to automatically retrieve images in huge, well-balanced datasets. However, in the medical field, such datasets are usually not available. This study proposed an advanced DL technique to enhance the accuracy of image retrieval in complex medical datasets. The proposed model can be integrated into five stages, namely pre-processing, decomposing the images, feature extraction, dimensionality reduction, and classification with an image retrieval mechanism. The hybridized Wavelet-Hadamard Transform (HWHT) was utilized to obtain both low and high frequency detail for analysis. In order to extract the main characteristics, the Gray Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM) was employed. Furthermore, to minimize feature complexity, Sine chaos based artificial rabbit optimization (SCARO) was utilized. By employing the Bhattacharyya Coefficient for improved similarity matching, the Bhattacharya Context performance aware global attention-based Transformer (BCGAT) improves classification accuracy. The experimental results proved that the COVID-19 Chest X-ray image dataset attained higher accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-Score of 99.5%, 97.1%, 97.1%, and 97.1%, 97.1%, respectively. However, the chest x-ray image (pneumonia) dataset has attained higher accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score values of 98.60%, 98.49%, 97.40%, and 98.50%, respectively. For the NIH chest X-ray dataset, the accuracy value is 99.67%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.