ArticleScientific reports2025
Clinical and pathological features of lymphomas in the breast: a comprehensive multicentric study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bilateral primary breast diffuse large B-cell lymphoma detected by mammography but partially occult on FDG PET/CT: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Primary breast follicular lymphoma without a BCL2 rearrangement: insights into extranodal lymphoma biology.Blood research · 2026Article
- Beyond traditional survival estimates: conditional survival and individualized prognosis in primary breast lymphoma.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma presenting as a skin-based breast finding detected on screening mammography.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma: a case report and literature review.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Breast Implant-Associated Epstein-Barr Virus-Positive Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.Case reports in hematology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Breast lymphomas, though rare, present a unique spectrum of clinical and pathological characteristics. This multicenter retrospective study evaluates 92 cases from four international institutions over a ten-year period to provide a comprehensive analysis of primary breast lymphomas (PBLs), secondary breast lymphomas (SBLs), and related subtypes, including breast implant-associated lymphomas (BIA-ALCL) and intra-mammary lymph node lymphomas. Primary breast lymphomas accounted for 46.7% of cases, with a predominance of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Secondary breast involvement, observed in 43.5% of cases, displayed a more diverse histological distribution, with follicular lymphoma being the most common subtype. Breast implant-associated lymphomas (BIA-ALCL) constituted 6.5% of cases, exclusively involving anaplastic large cell T-cell lymphoma, ALK-negative. The study highlights significant differences in patient demographics, clinical presentation, and survival outcomes. PBLs primarily affected older patients (mean age: 68.4 years) and were associated with longer lymphoma-specific survival compared to SBLs (76.12 vs. 59.45 months; p = 0.001). Notably, survival differences were evident within histological subtypes, emphasizing the impact of disease origin on prognosis. BIA-ALCL cases were distinct in clinical features and histology, with a younger mean age (47.5 years) and frequent association with unilateral effusion. This analysis underscores the necessity for precise diagnostic and therapeutic strategies tailored to the unique biology of breast lymphomas. Future research should aim to elucidate molecular mechanisms and optimize management protocols to improve patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.