Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40781243›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Pupil size modulation drives retinal activity in mice and shapes human perception.

Tjasa Lapanja, Pietro Micheli, Andrés González-Guerra, Oleksandr Radomskyi, Gioia De Franceschi, Anna Muraveva, Alexander Attinger, Chiara Nina Roth, Matteo Tripodi, Tom Boissonnet and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tjasa Lapanja *Epigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6846-6032
Pietro Micheli *Epigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Andrés González-GuerraEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1230-5293
Oleksandr RadomskyiEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Gioia De FranceschiEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Anna MuravevaEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4650-9238
Alexander AttingerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6129-3199
Chiara Nina RothFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Matteo TripodiEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Tom BoissonnetEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Marina SabbadiniEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.
Josephine JüttnerInstitute of Molecular and Clinical Ophthalmology Basel, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-8050-4020
Petri Ala-LaurilaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.
Georg KellerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1401-0117
Gabriel Peinado AllinaDepartment of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0867-3034
Hiroki AsariEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-1935
Santiago B RompaniEpigenetics and Neurobiology Unit, EMBL Rome, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, 00015, Italy. santiago.rompani@embl.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3994-3052

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Retinal adaptation is assisted by the pupil, with pupil contraction and dilation thought to prevent global light changes from triggering neuronal activity in the retina. However, we find that pupillary constriction from increased light, the pupillary light reflex (PLR), can drive strong responses in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in vivo in mice. The PLR drives neural activity in all RGC types, and pupil-driven activity is relayed to the visual cortex. Furthermore, the consensual PLR allows one eye to respond to luminance changes presented to the other eye, leading to a binocular response and modulation during low-amplitude luminance changes. To test if pupil-induced activity is consciously perceived, we performed psychophysics on human volunteers, finding a perceptual dimming consistent with PLR-induced responses in mice. Our findings thus uncover that pupillary dynamics can directly induce visual activity that is consciously detectable, suggesting an active role for the pupil in encoding perceived ambient luminance.

Indexed as

PupilReflex, PupillaryRetinaRetinal Ganglion CellsVisual PerceptionAdultAnimalsFemaleHumansLightMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPhotic StimulationVisual CortexYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40781243
PMCPMC12334691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.