ArticleScientific reports2025
Research and application of an evaluation mechanism for enterprise information systems.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research focuses on the challenges in implementing and operating enterprise information systems, mainly the construction barriers and unclear value demonstration. From an intelligent data-driven perspective, a comprehensive evaluation mechanism was designed based on a multi-dimensional index system covering planning, construction, operation, and effectiveness, using an improved normal cloud model to evaluate the application quality and practical effects of information systems. By selecting 150 representative information systems across multiple industries such as tobacco, healthcare, and finance, collecting 31,500 pieces of evaluation data, and conducting comparative analysis experiments, the results show that the evaluation results of this mechanism are accurate and highly consistent with objective reality. In addition, compared with other models, it demonstrates excellent adaptability and comprehensiveness, can be adjusted according to the specific conditions of information systems, and provides valuable decision-making support for enterprises to improve and optimize their information systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.