ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal Alzheimer's disease recognition from image, text and audio.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that significantly affects cognitive function. One widely used diagnostic approach involves analyzing patients' verbal descriptions of pictures. While prior studies have primarily focused on speech- and text-based models, the integration of visual context is still at an early stage. This study proposes a novel multimodal AD prediction model that integrates image, text, and audio modalities. The image and text modalities are processed using a vision-language model and structured as a bipartite graph before fusion, while all three modalities are integrated through a combination of co-attention-based intermediate fusion and late fusion, enabling effective inter-modality cooperation. The proposed model achieves an accuracy of 90.61%, outperforming state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, an ablation study quantifies the contribution of each modality using Shapley values, which serve as the foundation for a novel auxiliary loss function that adaptively adjusts modality importance during training. The findings indicate that integrating image, text, and audio modalities via a co-attention-based intermediate fusion enhances AD classification performance. Additionally, this study analyzes modality-specific attention patterns and key linguistic tokens, demonstrating that audio and text provide complementary cues for AD classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.