ArticleScientific reports2025
Analysing community-level spending behaviour contributing to high carbon emissions using stochastic block models.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Analysing community-level spending behaviour contributing to high carbon emissions using stochastic block models.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Large financial transaction datasets are increasingly used to estimate carbon emissions associated with individual spending. However, to effectively target high-emission spending areas and implement successful carbon reduction strategies, policymakers and financial institutions need to understand individual consumer spending behaviour. In this study, we describe an approach to identify spending patterns in large financial transaction datasets, using stochastic block modelling for community detection on a bipartite network. This is an effective method to form communities of consumers who share similar spending patterns across merchant categories, allowing us to identify the categories causing high carbon emissions for each group of consumers. We also introduce a modification to the weights of the bipartite network which allows us to keep the average community spending constant across different categories. The impact and applications of this study are twofold. First, it highlights the importance of transaction datasets and stochastic block modelling in providing insights for financial institutions in their efforts to decarbonise by identifying areas for targeted behavioural strategies for carbon reduction. Second, it provides researchers with a framework to examine how different factors, such as consumer spending patterns, energy usage, or transportation habits, interact with one another. This is done while keeping overall spending levels consistent across various communities, allowing for a controlled analysis of behavioural and economic impacts on carbon reduction efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.