ArticleScientific reports2025
Emergency risk dispatch for integrated electricity and heating system subjected to hurricane event.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hurricane extreme weather pose a risk of component failure for the integrated electricity and heat system (IEHS). To address the uncertainty arising from component failures during hurricanes, we propose an emergency risk dispatch model (ERDM) for the IEHS as a risk mitigation strategy. The objective function, aimed at ensuring the secure operation of the IEHS, is defined as the minimization of load curtailment costs and serves as a quantified risk indicator. To represent the uncertainty related to component failures, we construct an ambiguity set based on margined moments. This ambiguity set accounts for the uncertainty associated with hurricane extreme weather through the use of distributional robust risk chance constraints (DRRCC). Furthermore, we employ the worst-case conditional value at risk (WC-CVaR) approximation approach to address the DRRCC. Subsequently, we introduce the average risk probability as a measure to quantify the risk level associated with chance constraint violations. We conduct case studies to analyze the risks and find that the risk coefficient has a substantial impact on risk probability within the ERDM in the context of hurricane damage. Additionally, higher values risk coefficient result in greater risk probability and lower risk costs.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.