Observational studyWomen's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
Differences in Contraceptive Method Discontinuation and Contraceptive Method Preferences by Disability Status.
Observational study in Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "It should have been my decision": A mixed methods investigation of contraceptive coercion among U.S. patients with and without disabilities.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundContraceptive care delivery to people with disabilities must be contextualized within the U.S. history of stratified reproduction and eugenics. Significant sexual and reproductive health inequities have been documented between people with disabilities and those without disabilities in family planning service receipt and contraceptive method use. Little research has examined how discontinuation of contraception or dissatisfaction with contraceptive methods may differ for people with disabilities.
objectiveThis study assesses differences in contraceptive desires and experiences between disabled and nondisabled individuals.
methodsOur sample included self-identified female respondents from the 2011-2019 National Survey of Family Growth. We examined demographic and sexual and reproductive health differences between disabled and nondisabled respondents based on self-report of disabilities. Unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models estimated differences in contraceptive method discontinuation due to dissatisfaction and method choice based on cost.
resultsDifferences by disability status were found for reports of fecundity and the contraceptive method used in the past 12 months. In both unadjusted and adjusted models, significantly more disabled people than nondisabled people reported having discontinued their method because of dissatisfaction and having wanted to use a different method if cost were not an issue.
conclusionsSelf-reported disabilities are associated with contraceptive method dissatisfaction and unmet contraceptive preferences. Efforts are needed to tailor person-centered clinical care that is responsive to this population's reproductive wants and needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.