ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2026
American Society of Neuroradiology Consensus Statement: Integrating Neuro-PET Interpretation into Neuroradiology Training and Practice.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
35 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMolecular imaging, particularly PET, has advanced the diagnosis and management of disease by visualizing biologic processes at a cellular and molecular level. PET imaging of the brain, spine, and head/neck, summarized under the umbrella term neuro-PET, enables noninvasive diagnosis and monitoring of diseases such as dementia, epilepsy, cancer, movement, or autoimmune disorders. The increasing prevalence of these conditions, as well as new treatment options necessitating response assessment, are expected to escalate neuro-PET imaging volumes, with projections for an increase in the need for specialized imaging services. This increasing clinical need highlights existing workforce shortages and underscores the need for neuroradiologists to acquire proficiency in molecular imaging. This expanded role seeks to address the growing demand. To this end, we propose a rigorous, structured, patient-centered, and collaborative framework for expanding neuroradiologists' training and practice to include neuro-PET interpretation.
methodsThis American Society of Neuroradiology consensus statement outlines competency recommendations, training pathways, and implementation strategies to incorporate neuro-PET into neuroradiology practice. This approach is based on existing guidelines and was informed by survey data from neuroradiologists and molecular imaging subspecialists revealing current practice patterns and training needs. For neuroradiology fellows, structured training encompasses hands-on neuro-PET imaging experience, understanding the biologic and molecular basis of radiopharmaceuticals used in neuro-PET, and integrating molecular insights with anatomic data. Neuroradiologists beyond fellowship can undertake practice-based curriculum involving supervised case interpretation, standardized reader training courses, continuing medical education (CME), and peer review. KEY MESSAGE: Neuroradiologists, with their in-depth expertise of central nervous system structure and function, are well positioned to meld molecular imaging data with traditional anatomic findings. They can achieve competency and should be granted practice privileges in interpreting neuro-PET studies through a comprehensive combination of structured training, hands-on clinical experience, and documented CME hours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.