Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40780868›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN

Trauma and cannabis cue-induced reward circuit functional connectivity in cannabis users with trauma histories.

Mikaela A Ethier-Gagnon, Sarah DeGrace, Pablo Romero-Sanchiz, Carl A Helmick, Philip G Tibbo, Candice E Crocker, Kimberly Good, Abraham Rudnick, Tessa Cosman, Sean P Barrett and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mikaela A Ethier-GagnonFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Sarah DeGraceFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Pablo Romero-SanchizFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Carl A HelmickFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Philip G TibboFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Candice E CrockerFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Kimberly GoodFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Abraham RudnickFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Tessa CosmanFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Sean P BarrettFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz).
Sherry H StewartFrom the Departments of Psychology and Neuroscience (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Romero-Sanchiz, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Psychiatry (Ethier-Gagnon, DeGrace, Helmick, Tibbo, Crocker, Good, Rudnick, Cosman, Barrett, Stewart), and Diagnostic Radiology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S. (Crocker); the School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK (Romero-Sanchiz) sherry.stewart@dal.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA history of trauma increases risk for excessive and problematic cannabis use, and this relationship may involve conditioned cannabis craving to trauma cues arising through classical and operant conditioning. Alterations in functional connectivity (FC) after trauma reminders within or between brain regions associated with reward processing may potentiate this link; however, the underlying neural mechanisms remain unstudied.

methodsWe recruited cannabis users with trauma histories from February 2021 to August 2022. Participants completed a semi-structured interview about a personally relevant traumatic experience, a typical cannabis use situation unrelated to trauma or stress, and an emotionally neutral situation, with responses informing development of 3-minute audiovisual cues. Using a randomized cross-over design, we presented personalized audio recordings and images of the neutral, cannabis-related, and trauma-related situations to participants in counterbalanced order using a cue reactivity paradigm adapted for the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) environment. Participants self-reported on subjective cannabis craving and positive and negative affect after each cue presentation. We measured FC between striatal, cortical, and limbic regions via functional MRI during each cue.

resultsWe included 27 cannabis users with trauma histories (74.1% female, average age 32.2 years, standard deviation 10.5 years). Trauma cues increased cannabis craving and negative affect and decreased positive affect relative to other cues. Cannabis cues increased craving relative to neutral and baseline cues. Trauma cues increased FC within the striatum and between striatal-cortical regions relative to neutral cues and increased striatocortical FC relative to cannabis cues. Cannabis cues increased cortical and corticolimbic FC relative to trauma cues and increased striatocortical FC relative to neutral cues. LIMITATIONS: The sample was small in size and not formed exclusively of participants with diagnoses of posttraumatic stress disorder or cannabis use disorder.

conclusionFindings suggested potential neural mechanisms underlying the link between trauma and cannabis use. Trauma- and cannabis-related cues may potentiate cannabis craving through altered reward circuit FC.

Indexed as

BrainCuesMarijuana AbusePsychological TraumaRewardAdultCerebral CortexCravingCross-Over StudiesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40780868
PMCPMC12342834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.