ArticleBMJ open2025
Analysis of the utilisation of Chuna manual therapy for musculoskeletal disorders after its coverage under national health insurance in Korea: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thrust Versus Non-Thrust Chuna Manipulative Therapy for Low-Back Pain with Pelvic Deviation: A Multicenter Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Ten-year healthcare utilization patterns among patients with type 2 diabetes and degenerative spinal disorders: a nationwide comparative analysis using nationwide sample.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo examine trends in Chuna manual therapy utilisation for musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) following its inclusion in the National Health Insurance (NHI) system in Korea in 2019 using claims data from the Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service (HIRA).
designRetrospective analysis of NHI claims data.
settingNationwide medical institutions, based on HIRA claims data from April 2019 to December 2021.
participantsAll patients who received at least one Chuna therapy session during the study period. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome: Annual trends in Chuna manual therapy claims. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Patient demographics, therapy frequency, MSD diagnoses and concurrent therapies.
resultsA total of 12 729 625 Chuna therapy claims were analysed, showing a gradual annual increase in utilisation from 2019 to 2021. The most common age group was 45-54 years (22.3%), with female patients comprising a higher proportion (55.8%) than male patients.Low back pain (M54.5), lumbar sprain and strain (S33.5) and cervicalgia (M54.2) were the most common diagnoses. Patients receiving Complex Chuna (50% co-payment) had more treatment sessions than those receiving Simple Chuna or Complex Chuna (80% co-payment), with spinal disorders such as spinal stenosis (M48.0) and intervertebral disc disorders (M51.1, M50.1) associated with higher treatment frequency. Acupuncture was the most common concurrent therapy (97.4%).
conclusionsThis study is the first to comprehensively analyse Chuna therapy utilisation using nationwide NHI claims data. The findings confirm that Chuna therapy is widely used for MSDs, particularly among middle-aged and elderly patients with spinal or muscle-related conditions. Patients with severe or chronic spinal diseases were more likely to receive frequent Chuna therapy sessions. These results provide insights into the utilisation patterns of Chuna therapy and highlight the need for further research to refine reimbursement policies based on disease severity and patient characteristics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.