Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40780716›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Cervical precancer thermal ablation versus LLETZ excision comparative efficacy study in WLWH (TALL Study): protocol for a randomised clinical trial in South Africa.

Robyn A Adams, Helen Kelly, Frederick H Van der Merwe, Jennifer L Butt, Johanna E Zwanepoel, Matthys H Botha

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robyn A AdamsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa robynadams@sun.ac.za.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1473-5054
Helen KellyDepartment of Clinical Research, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5547-3807
Frederick H Van der MerweDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Jennifer L ButtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Johanna E ZwanepoelDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.
Matthys H BothaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6046-1453

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCervical cancer remains a significant global health concern and is the fourth most prevalent cancer among women. In South Africa, it is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in women aged 15-44 years. The disease is typically preceded by persistent high-risk HPV infection, leading to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and eventually cancer. Currently, in South Africa, management primarily involves excision, particularly through large loop excision of the transformation zone, which has associated risks and limitations. Thermal ablation is an alternative cost-effective treatment method, providing a straightforward approach to treatment, particularly advantageous in environments characterised by limited resources. The study aims to assess the efficacy, safety and patient experience of thermal ablation, providing valuable data for potential integration into South Africa's cervical cancer prevention policies.

methodsRandomised controlled trial in which 420 women living with HIV aged 30-60 years will be recruited from the Colposcopy Clinic at Tygerberg Hospital and will be followed up for a period of two years. The primary study endpoint is a test of cure that will be assessed by HPV genotyping, cervical cytology and histology at six month intervals. Other endpoints include the occurrence of adverse events. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Committee of Stellenbosch University (Ethics Reference No: M20/11/035) and by the Western Cape Department of Health and Wellness via the National Health Research Database (WC_202109_016). All study procedures comply with the Declaration of Helsinki, South African Good Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Medical Research Council's ethical guidelines. Trial results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals, national and international conference presentations and professional associations. A lay summary will be shared with the Community Advisory Board to guide community-level dissemination. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pan African Clinical Trial Registry: PACTR202504820339039.

Indexed as

Ablation TechniquesColposcopyPrecancerous ConditionsUterine Cervical DysplasiaUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansMiddle AgedPapillomavirus InfectionsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSouth AfricaTreatment OutcomeRandomized Controlled TrialTreatment OutcomeUterine Cervical Neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID40780716
PMCPMC12336513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.