Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40780670›Full record

ReviewAsia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.)

Update on pediatric cataract surgery.

I Christopher Lloyd, M Edward Wilson, Rupal H Trivedi, Susmito Biswas, Jane L Ashworth, Elspeth Green, Jay Self, Kelly Voltz, Cyril Archambault, Thaddeus S McClatchey and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Asia-Pacific journal of ophthalmology (Philadelphia, Pa.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

I Christopher LloydDept of Clinical and Academic Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK; MAHSC, University of Manchester, UK.
M Edward WilsonStorm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Rupal H TrivediStorm Eye Institute, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Susmito BiswasMAHSC, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Jane L AshworthMAHSC, University of Manchester, UK; Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Elspeth GreenManchester Royal Eye Hospital, Manchester, UK.
Jay SelfDepartment of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Southampton, UK; Clinical and Experimental Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Southampton, UK.
Kelly VoltzByers Eye Institute at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Cyril ArchambaultUniversité de Montréal, Canada.
Thaddeus S McClatcheyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Nassau University Medical Center, East Meadow, New York, USA.
Scott K McClatcheyDepartment of Ophthalmology, Naval Medical Readiness and Training Command, San Diego, CA, USA; Uniformed Services University of Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Joanne RandereeDept of Clinical and Academic Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK; Moorfields Eye Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Jessica GowingDept of Clinical and Academic Ophthalmology, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, UK.
Sophie CowenMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK; Royal Devon University Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter, UK.
Lucy BarkerMoorfields Eye Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Ramesh KekunnayaChild Sight Institute, L V Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Scott R LambertByers Eye Institute at Stanford, Palo Alto, CA, USA; Department of Ophthalmology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA. Electronic address: lambert7@stanford.edu.

Funding

Stanford Vision Research CoreP30EY026877 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Jeffrey L Goldberg · 2017 to 2026
$8.0M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY026877
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataracts in infants and children are comparatively rare, but they remain an important cause of potentially lifelong visual impairment, largely because of associated deprivation amblyopia. This is particularly seen in children missed by screening programs and thus presenting late for treatment. However, advances in diagnosis, surgical techniques and amblyopia management have improved the prognosis for most children seen with this condition. This comprehensive review focuses on all aspects of the care required to optimize outcomes. It covers modern genetic investigations, performed to precisely determine underlying cataract etiology, and discusses the use of outcome-based evidence to guide the timing of surgical intervention. The paper also outlines the options available to clinicians for post-operative refractive error correction and compares indications, risks and benefits for the use of contact lenses, spectacles and intraocular lenses (IOL). The challenge of choosing the most appropriate dioptric power of IOL to implant into a growing eye is discussed, as is consideration of types of IOLs that can be considered and the surgical techniques needed. Evidence-based approaches to the clinical management of amblyopia, glaucoma and visual axis opacification, the three most common complications seen following pediatric cataract surgery, are reviewed. Two specific conditions associated with pediatric cataract are discussed in detail--persistent fetal vasculature and ocular trauma. Strategies for assessment, management and surgical treatment of these conditions are reviewed.

Indexed as

CataractCataract ExtractionAmblyopiaChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantLens Implantation, IntraocularVisual AcuityAmblyopiaContact lensesGlaucoma following cataract surgeryPediatric cataract surgeryPersistent fetal vasculatureVisual axis opacification

Identifiers

PMID40780670
PMCPMC12399275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.