ReviewToxicology and applied pharmacology2025
Carcinogenicity of some metals evaluated by the IARC Monographs: A synopsis of the evaluations of arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, and antimony.
Review in Toxicology and applied pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The role of cobalt exposure in the incidence of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC public health · 2026Pooled it
- Review
- Diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma presenting with the appearance of mesenteric panniculitis: A case report.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Differential Sensitivity of Endocrine and Non-Endocrine Tissues to Cadmium-Induced Lipid Peroxidation and the Protective Role of Melatonin.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Review
- ICP-MS determination of trace metals in commercial cornflakes from the UAE market.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Chitosan-Based Adsorbents: A Versatile Platform for the Removal of Arsenate and Copper Ions from Water.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Long-term exposure to PMAir quality, atmosphere, & health · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metals represent a major area of concern due to their extensive industrial applications, environmental persistence, and well-documented adverse health effects. Notably, metals (and metalloids) such as arsenic, cadmium, beryllium, chromium, cobalt, lead, and nickel are known for their toxicity and carcinogenic potential, raising significant public health concerns. Human exposure to these metals occurs through different routes, posing both environmental and workplace hazards. The Monographs programme of the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) plays a critical role in identifying carcinogenic hazards to humans, providing a robust scientific foundation for global actions to prevent cancer. This review focuses on selected metals and metalloids: arsenic, cadmium, cobalt, and antimony, emphasizing how the IARC evaluation process considers the biological properties of the metals and their compounds, and the evidence from experimental animal studies and mechanistic data, including the application of the key characteristics of carcinogens (KCs) framework, in determining carcinogenic potential. The IARC Monographs contribute to a comprehensive understanding of metal-induced carcinogenicity and reinforce the importance of systematic, evidence-based approaches to inform public health interventions and regulatory decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.