ArticleUrology2025
Outcomes Following Metoidioplasty and Phalloplasty Gender Affirming Surgery With Urethral Lengthening: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.
Article in Urology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Decision making in metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery: a mixed methods study.The journal of sexual medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo generate surgeon consensus on metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery outcomes statements using a modified Delphi method. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe invited metoidioplasty and phalloplasty gender-affirming surgery surgeons to anonymously participate in a two-round web-based Delphi survey to generate consensus on patient centered outcome statements generated from surgeon practice patterns, literature review, and patient input. Consensus was predefined as at least 70% agreement. Surgeons were asked to provide open ended feedback on statements which were thematically analyzed and used to revise statements not reaching consensus for a second-round survey.
resultsTwenty-one metoidioplasty and phalloplasty surgeons were invited and 16 (76%) reviewed 39 statements in round one and 17/20 (85%) reviewed 10 statements in round two. Following round two, nearly all statements reached consensus: 14/15 (93%) of statements on metoidioplasty, 11/12 (92%) of radial forearm phalloplasty statements and 12/12 (100%) of anterolateral thigh phalloplasty statements. We found that 12/12 (100%) statements on sexual health, 8/8 (100%) statements on nonurinary complications, and 16/18 (89%) statements on urinary outcomes met consensus.
conclusionIn a modified web-based Delphi survey, surgeons reached consensus on nearly all outcome statements. Variations in surgeon experience, length of follow up, and reporting of outcomes contribute to different definitions of urinary complications. Results from this study will help create decision making tools for individuals considering metoidioplasty and phalloplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.