Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40780181›Full record

ArticleMolecular cell2025

Chromatin-dependent motif syntax defines differentiation trajectories.

Sevi Durdu, Murat Iskar, Luke Isbel, Leslie Hoerner, Christiane Wirbelauer, Lukas Burger, Daniel Hess, Vytautas Iesmantavicius, Dirk Schübeler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cell, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sevi DurduFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Murat IskarFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Luke IsbelFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; South Australian Immunogenomics Cancer Institute (SAiGENCI), The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia; Adelaide Centre for Epigenetics, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Leslie HoernerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Christiane WirbelauerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Lukas BurgerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, Basel, Switzerland.
Daniel HessFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Vytautas IesmantaviciusFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland.
Dirk SchübelerFriedrich Miescher Institute for Biomedical Research, Basel, Switzerland; Faculty of Science, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. Electronic address: dirk@fmi.ch.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription factors (TFs) recognizing DNA motifs within regulatory regions drive cell identity. Despite recent advances, their specificity remains incompletely understood. Here, we address this by contrasting two TFs, Neurogenin-2 (NGN2) and MyoD1, which recognize ubiquitous E-box motifs yet drive distinct cell fates toward neurons and muscles, respectively. Upon induction in mouse embryonic stem cells, we monitor binding across differentiation, employing an interpretable machine learning approach that integrates preexisting DNA accessibility. This reveals a chromatin-dependent motif syntax, delineating both common and factor-specific binding, validated by cellular and in vitro assays. Shared binding sites reside in open chromatin, locally influenced by nucleosomes. In contrast, factor-specific binding in closed chromatin involves NGN2 and MyoD1 acting as pioneer factors, influenced by motif variant frequencies, motif spacing, and interaction partners, which together account for subsequent lineage divergence. Transferring our methodology to other models demonstrates how a combination of opportunistic binding and context-specific chromatin-opening underpin TF specificity, driving differentiation trajectories.

Indexed as

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell DifferentiationChromatinMouse Embryonic Stem CellsMyoD ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsNucleotide MotifsAnimalsBinding SitesCell LineageHumansMiceNeuronsNucleosomesProtein BindingBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsChromatinMyoD1 myogenic differentiation proteinMyoD ProteinNerve Tissue ProteinsNeurog2 protein, mouseNucleosomescell differentiationchromatin accessibilityE-boxgene regulationmachine learningmotif syntaxmotif variantspioneer factorspredictive modelstranscription factor specificity

Identifiers

PMID40780181
PMCPMC12488066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.