Article in The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Patrícia Montessoro *Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7541-7714
Joaquin Felipe Roca Paixão *Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0000-1197-7827
Carinne N M CostaLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3872-025X
Laura DucattiLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0005-5843-4201
Letícia Perdigão GrangeiroLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-9439-5274
Vivian RuivoLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0006-1240-8347
Adriana Flores FusaroLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-7192-556X
Helkin F BallesterosLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-5365-1841
Vanessa IurifLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1495-1387
Luiz Mors CabralLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-7478-2215
Jelmir Craveiro de AndradeLaboratory of Advanced Analysis in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (LAABBM), Department of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-4886-302X
Leticia TessaroLaboratory of Advanced Analysis in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (LAABBM), Department of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-5943-3535
Wallace de Paula BernadoSetor Fisiologia Vegetal, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias (CCTA), Univ. Estadual Norte Fluminense (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-1392-5611
Fernanda Silva CoelhoDepartamento de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento, Empresa HapiSeeds, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0009-7774-5055
Bruna Gino de Araújo-LopesLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3047-5408
Janice de Almeida EnglerINRAE, Université Cote d'Azur, CNRS, ISA, Sophia Antipolis, 06903, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8312-672X
Jérémie BazinInstitute of Plant Sciences Paris-Saclay (IPS2), CNRS, INRAE, Université Paris Saclay - Evry, Université de Paris, Gif sur Yvette, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7713-5278
Eliemar CampostriniSetor Fisiologia Vegetal, Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Agropecuárias (CCTA), Univ. Estadual Norte Fluminense (UENF), Campos dos Goytacazes, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-1084
Carlos Adam Conte-JuniorLaboratory of Advanced Analysis in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (LAABBM), Department of Biochemistry, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0001-6133-5080
Adriana Silva HemerlyLaboratório de Biologia Molecular de Plantas, Instituto de Bioquímica Médica, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0003-3748-7118
Funding
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 306643/2022-7Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível SuperiorFundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/201.109/2022Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro E-26/211.324/2021
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Plants have developed a sophisticated regulatory network that coordinates gene expression in meristematic zones in response to environmental conditions. Here, we identified a protein in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) that interacts with Armadillo BTB Arabidopsis protein 1 (ABAP1), a negative regulator of the cell cycle in plants. We characterized the ABAP1 interacting protein (named AIP10) investigating its role in modulating plant development. T-DNA insertion lines with silenced expression of AIP10 were evaluated phenotypically (morphology, fresh and dry weight), via transcriptomics analyses (RNA-Seq and RT-qPCR), physiologically (biochemically, Fluorcam and Li-COR) and metabolically (ATR-FTIR). We showed that AIP10 integrates cell division rates with transcriptional and primary metabolism reprogramming through its protein interactions with ABAP1 and KIN10, a subunit of SnRK1 (sucrose non-fermenting-1-related protein kinase 1). ABAP1 levels and activity were reduced in the absence of AIP10, licensing cell cycle progression for longer periods, which culminated in increased rates of cell division that boosted vegetative and reproductive growth. AIP10 knockout triggered a major transcriptional reprogramming of plant primary metabolism, possibly through SnRK1 modulation. aip10 mutants showed increased photosynthetic efficiency, as well as boosted carbon fixation, leading to increased biomass, seed productivity, and higher contents of proteins, lipids (triglycerides), and carbohydrates. Finally, we propose that the modulation of AIP10 expression is part of a mechanism that coordinates higher rates of cell division with better photosynthetic performance and carbon fixation to metabolically meet the plant energy demand, allowing the generation of plants with increased biomass and productivity.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
The ABAP1 interacting protein 10 (AIP10) exerts a dual role in the cell cycle and primary metabolism pathways in Arabidopsis thaliana. · full record | OpenQuestion