ArticleThe Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics2025
Experimental and computational approaches for evaluating molecule interactions with equilibrative nucleoside transporters 1 and 2.
Article in The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ToxPoint: The case for Equilibrative Nucleoside Transporters in current regulatory guidance.Toxicological sciences : an official journal of the Society of Toxicology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Equilibrative nucleoside transporters (ENTs) facilitate the equilibrative movement of nucleosides and nucleobases across cell membranes in a sodium-independent manner. ENT1 (SLC29A1) and ENT2 (SLC29A2) also transport nucleoside analogs and can affect the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs used in cancer, viral infections, and inflammatory disorders. ENT1 and ENT2 may be differentiated functionally by their sensitivity to inhibition by nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBMPR), and we used this difference in NBMPR sensitivity to create a HeLa-based ENT2 inhibition assay. We then screened a library of 1600 diverse compounds composed of drugs and natural products for inhibition against ENT1 and ENT2, selecting a subset of compounds for side-by-side comparison of dose-response studies. We used these screening data to build machine learning models for ENT1 and ENT2 inhibition, employing dataset balancing and conformal prediction to adjust for the asymmetrical nature of the data. A random forest model predicted a prospective test set of 44 additional molecules (from the MedChem Express Drug Repurposing Library [2700 compounds]) as potential ENT1 inhibitors with 59% accuracy. This resulted in the identification of the Food and Drug Administration-approved drugs isradipine, avanafil, and istradefylline as inhibitors of ENT1. These new experimental and computational methods and models for these clinically relevant transporters can be used to evaluate drug-transporter interactions early in drug discovery, before testing in vivo. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Recent regulatory guidance have suggest the inclusion of the equilibrative nucleoside transporters (eg, ENT1 and ENT2) as transporters with emerging clinical relevance for in vitro and in vivo assessment. We have screened over 1600 diverse molecules, allowing us to build machine learning models that in turn were further used to make predictions to validate the models. Our combined experimental and machine learning approach resulted in the identification of multiple Food and Drug Administration-approved medications as inhibitors of ENT1 or ENT2.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.