Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779628›Full record

ArticleScience advances2025

Nonlinear spatial integration allows the retina to detect the sign of defocus in natural scenes.

Sarah Goethals, Awen Louboutin, Samy Hamlaoui, Tom Quetu, Samuele Virgili, Matias Alejandro Goldin, Konogan Baranton, Olivier Marre

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Science advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sarah GoethalsGroupe Lens Innovation, R&D Life and Light Science, EssilorLuxottica, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2390-9180
Awen LouboutinInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.
Samy HamlaouiGroupe Lens Innovation, Digital Innovation, EssilorLuxottica, Paris, France.
Tom QuetuInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0009-0005-0045-1324
Samuele VirgiliInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0003-1693-4580
Matias Alejandro GoldinInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5151-3637
Konogan BarantonGroupe Lens Innovation, R&D Life and Light Science, EssilorLuxottica, Paris, France.
Olivier MarreInstitut de la Vision, Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0090-6190

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Eye growth is regulated by the visual input. Many studies suggest that the retina can detect whether a visual image is focused in front of or behind the back of the eye and modulate eye growth to bring it back to focus. How can the retina distinguish between these two types of defocus? Here, we simulated how eye optics transforms natural images and recorded how the isolated retina responds to different types of simulated defocus. We found that some ganglion cell types could distinguish between an image focused in front of or behind the retina by estimating spatial contrast. Aberrations in the eye optics made spatial contrast, but not luminance, a reliable cue to distinguish these two types of defocus. Our results suggest a mechanism for how the retina can estimate the sign of defocus and provide an explanation for several results aiming at mitigating strong myopia by slowing down eye growth.

Indexed as

RetinaAnimalsHumansMyopiaPhotic StimulationRetinal Ganglion CellsVision, Ocular

Identifiers

PMID40779628
PMCPMC12333688

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.