ArticlePloS one2025
Oak-YOLO: A high-performance detection model for automated Oak seed defect identification.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- An improved YOLOv11n-based method for high-precision detection of ginkgo fruits in complex natural environments.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oak seeds are highly susceptible to pest infestations due to their elevated starch content, which significantly impairs germination and subsequent growth. To address this challenge, we developed a high-resolution imaging system and proposed an improved YOLO-based model named Oak-YOLO for efficient and accurate defect detection in oak seeds. The proposed model enhances the YOLOv8 architecture by incorporating EfficientViT as the backbone to improve global feature extraction, and integrates a Ghost-DynamicConv detection head to enhance the representation of small and irregular defects such as insect holes and cracks. Additionally, the WIoUv3 loss function is introduced to optimize bounding box regression for complex target shapes and overlapping instances.Extensive experiments were conducted on both single-object and multi-object datasets. Oak-YOLO achieved a mAP50 of 94.5%, an F1-score of 95.3%, and a precision of 94.% on the oak-intensive dataset, with an inference speed of 132.2 FPS. Cross-device validation using mobile-captured images further demonstrated the model's robustness, achieving mAP50 scores of 94.7% and 93.8% on different smartphone test sets. Comparative evaluations show that Oak-YOLO outperforms existing YOLO models, including YOLOv9 to YOLOv12, by delivering a favorable trade-off between detection accuracy and computational efficiency. These results highlight the potential of Oak-YOLO as a practical solution for real-time seed quality inspection in forestry applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.