ArticlePloS one2025
Proximal and distal middle cerebral artery diameter ratio and lenticulostriate artery infarction.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLipohyalinotic degeneration (LD) and branch atheromatous disease (BAD) can contribute to subcortical infarctions in the lenticulostriate artery (LSA) territory. This study aimed to identify the association between the proximal and distal middle cerebral artery (MCA) diameter ratio and the two different pathomechanisms of LSA infarction.
methodsPatients with acute LSA infarctions categorized as small vessel occlusive disease were included. Demographic and clinical data, along with MCA geometrical variables, were collected. LD and BAD were differentiated based on the length of the infarction diameter and number of axial slices. The proximal/distal M1 diameter ratio was calculated. MCA geometrics between LD and BAD were compared. Independent factors associated with LD were investigated. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis was used to evaluate hemodynamic parameters.
resultsA total of 117 patients were included, of whom 64 (54.7%) and 53 (45.3%) were classified as BAD and LD, respectively. LD was associated with hypertension and favorable prognosis. MCA geometric variables revealed that LD had a higher proximal/distal M1 diameter ratio, indicating a potential distinguishing factor. Multivariate analysis confirmed the independent association between LD and the proximal/distal M1 diameter ratio. The proximal/distal M1 diameter ratio also showed a positive correlation with the number of ipsilesional lacunes. CFD analysis showed that the LD model had faster, greater blood influx into LSAs and higher wall shear stress and pressure gradient compared with the BAD model.
conclusionsThis study suggests MCA geometry, particularly the proximal/distal M1 diameter ratio, may serve as an independent factor for identifying LD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.