Trial reportPloS one2025
Azithromycin for infants at risk of poor growth and development: A pooled secondary analysis of two randomized controlled trials.
Trial report in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Community Health Azithromycin Trial in Burkina Faso
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Infant Growth After Mass Administration of Azithromycin: Secondary Outcomes of a Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA network open · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn 2023, the World Health Organization (WHO) revised its guidelines for management of severe acute malnutrition (SAM). The revised guidelines include a focus on infants at risk of poor growth and development. The guideline identifies evaluation of routine antibiotics for these infants as a priority research area.
objectiveWe pooled data from two large randomized controlled trials evaluating azithromycin for prevention of infant mortality in Burkina Faso to assess whether azithromycin reduces mortality or wasting in this subgroup.
methodsInfants in the two trials were 1-12 weeks of age at enrollment. Infants were considered at risk of poor risk of growth and development per WHO: underweight (weight-for-age Z-score, WAZ < -2), wasted (weight-for-length Z-score, WLZ < -2), or MUAC < 11.0 cm among infants ≥6 weeks of age. Infants were randomized to a single oral (20 mg/kg) dose of azithromycin or matching placebo and were followed until 6 months of age. We evaluated vital status, underweight (WAZ < -2), wasting (WLZ < -2), and stunting (length-for-age Z-score, LAZ) at 6 months among infants at risk of poor growth and development based on WHO single measurement criteria.
resultsA total of 54,709 infants were enrolled in the two trials. Of these, 9,728 were at risk of poor growth and development based on baseline WAZ (N = 5,385), WLZ (N = 6,022), or MUAC (N = 1,541). We found no evidence of a difference in mortality (1.3% vs 1.1%, odds ratio, OR, 1.19, 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.82 to 1.72) or wasting (20.6% vs 20.2%, OR 1.03, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.14) at 6 months among infants receiving azithromycin versus placebo.
conclusionsIn infants aged 1-12 weeks at risk of poor growth and development, we do not have evidence that single dose azithromycin reduces mortality or improves growth outcomes.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03682654 and NCT03676764.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.