ArticlePloS one2025
"It's like a book in the palm of my hand": Adapting the Safe Delivery App for Papua New Guinea to improve quality of maternal and newborn care.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHealth workers in many low- and middle-income countries are not adequately trained to provide quality antenatal and intrapartum care. The freely available Safe Delivery App (the App) provides health care professionals with direct and instant access to evidence-based, up-to-date clinical guidelines equipping them with an on-the-job reference guide, even in the most remote areas. In this paper we describe the uptake and acceptability and the process to align the App in Papua New Guinea (PNG).
methodsBetween June 2022 and December 2024, quantitative and qualitative methods were used to explore the usage and acceptability of the App among health care workers in PNG, re-designing images and aligning clinical content with PNG national clinical guidelines. Dissemination of the App took place through formal and informal networks, including a training of trainers' program in one province.
resultsThe App was seen as an acceptable and useful tool among midwives and nurses working clinically, particularly those in remote areas and midwifery educators. There was an increase in the use of the App, from 354 registered users in 2022 to 1304 in 2024. The majority of users were midwives and nurses, working in primary health care facilities and nursing and midwifery establishments. Participants reported that the App has led to changes in practice, supporting and encouraging staff to follow evidence-based guidelines, improving their clinical management.
conclusionThe Safe Delivery App is seen as a useful tool, supporting clinical practice, knowledge and skills, providing users with more confidence in their ability to provide quality maternal and newborn health care. Wider implementation of the App across PNG may be a potential way to support health care workers in the remote settings, providing up to date evidence based clinical guidance in the absence of skilled midwives and doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.