ArticlePloS one2025
Preoperative assessment using a scoring system after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil for locally advanced esophageal cancer: Who can avoid surgery?
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) is highly effective for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and patients with a good response sometimes desire to avoid surgery. The aim of this single-center, retrospective study was to predict the probability of residual tumors using a newly devised scoring system and identify conditions that may obviate the need for surgery. Between January 2017 and March 2024, 106 patients received NAC with DCF, followed by radical resection at our institution. After NAC, patients underwent multimodal assessments to correlate the evaluation parameters with residual tumors. A scoring system was developed by incorporating the parameters that exhibited significant differences. After calculating the scores for all patients, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was generated to determine the optimal cutoff value for predicting residual tumors. Eighteen patients achieved a pathological complete response, of whom 12 showed complete tumor disappearance, including lymph node metastases. The scoring system included the following seven parameters: endoscopic irregularity, elevation, and pink-color sign after iodine staining; identification of the main tumor, regional lymph nodes ≥5 mm in long diameter, presence of positive lymph node findings on computed tomography; and positive 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography. The area under the ROC curve was 0.957, with a cutoff value of 3 for residual tumors. All patients with a score of 0 showed complete tumor disappearance. Our scoring system suggests that surgery might be safely omitted in patients with a score of 0. Comprehensive and flexible clinical decision-making is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.