Observational studyPloS one2025
The PREDEP-SERT study protocol: A 6-month follow-up cohort study of predictors of effectiveness, tolerability and safety of sertraline for depression using Therapeutic Drug Monitoring.
Observational study in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Variability in Sertraline Pharmacokinetics in Routine Clinical Practice: Influence of Sex, Age, Body Weight, Smoking, and Co-Medication.Fundamental & clinical pharmacology · 2026Observational
- Associations of CYP2B6, CYP2C19, and CYP2D6 isoforms and phenoconversion with sertraline pharmacokinetics.PloS one · 2026Article
- Pharmacokinetics of acute sertraline overdose: an observational retrospective study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sertraline is a common first-line pharmacological treatment of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). There is no established consensus nor clinical guidelines for personalized dose adjustments, which imply risks of toxicity and lack of efficacy. To address these challenges, there is preliminary evidence of the clinical utility of the determination of blood levels of sertraline by means of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). Further evidence is needed regarding the optimal therapeutic range of sertraline in terms of an optimal efficacy/tolerability-safety balance, with need of prospective studies on the association between blood concentration of sertraline and clinical outcomes. The PREDEP-SERT study (PREdictors of response in DEPression treated with SERTraline) is a single-center, observational, longitudinal, ambispective cohort study of patients with MDD to investigate the association between blood concentration of sertraline and its effectiveness, tolerability and safety (pre-registered study in Spain, REec number: 0014-2022-OBS, https://reec.aemps.es/reec/observacional/0014-2022-OBS). It adopts wide inclusion and exclusion criteria in order to allow the inclusion of patients that are representative of real-world clinical practice. It includes an exploratory retrospective subcohort and a subsequent 6-month follow-up prospective subcohort, with repeated measures (blood concentrations of sertraline and clinical outcomes) at scheduled timepoints (15 days, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days and 6 months). Relevant clinical, pharmacogenetic and sociodemographic potential predictors, confounders and effect modifiers will be explored. Its primary objective is to prospectively assess the association between blood concentration of sertraline (and the ratio with its metabolite, N-desmethylsertraline) and the intensity of depressive symptoms measured by the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 6 months of treatment. Other secondary objectives are to assess the association between blood concentration of sertraline/N-desmethylsertraline and clinical variables of effectiveness (by means of validated clinical scales) and side effects at every timepoint. Its results may elucidate the clinical utility of TDM in the therapeutic management of MDD in a personalized fashion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.