Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779505›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Developmental differences in perceiving arousal and valence from dynamically unfolding emotional expressions.

Nikol Tsenkova, Daniela Bahn, Christina Kauschke, Gudrun Schwarzer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nikol TsenkovaPsychology and Sports Science, Department of Developmental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3874-3983
Daniela BahnInstitute of German Linguistics, Clinical Linguistics, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Christina KauschkeInstitute of German Linguistics, Clinical Linguistics, Philipps University, Marburg, Germany.
Gudrun SchwarzerPsychology and Sports Science, Department of Developmental Psychology, Justus Liebig University, Giessen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of emotion perception has predominantly been studied using static, unimodal stimuli featuring the faces of young adults. Most findings indicate a processing advantage for positive emotions in children (positivity bias) and a negativity bias in adults, although these results are usually task-dependent. We created a new stimulus database comprising digital avatars from four age groups, dynamically expressing happiness, happy-surprise, anger, and sadness in visual (face only) and visual-verbal (face and voice) conditions. To determine whether previously found biases would re-emerge with this new database, we tested the arousal and valence perception of positive and negative emotions in 6- and 7-year-old children and young adults. Our results revealed high correlations between children's and adults' responses but also significant differences: children rated negative expressions as more arousing compared to adults and positive emotions as more positive than adults. Additionally, visual-verbal presentations were perceived as more arousing than visual across both age groups. In terms of valence, all participants found positive emotions as more positive in the visual condition, whereas negative emotions were perceived as more negative in the visual-verbal condition. As one of the first studies to employ dynamically multimodal emotional expressions, our findings underscore the relevance of studying developmental differences in emotion perception using naturalistic stimuli.

Indexed as

ArousalEmotionsFacial ExpressionAdultChildFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40779505
PMCPMC12333977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.