Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779503›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

German translation and psychometric testing of the Postconcussion Symptom Inventory for adolescents in self-report (PCSI-SR13) and parent-report (PCSI-P).

Dagmar A Timmermann, Marina Zeldovich, Ugne Krenz, Ivana Holloway, Katrin Cunitz, Inga K Koerte, Anna Buchheim, Christel Salewski, Gerard A Gioia, Nicole von Steinbuechel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Dagmar A TimmermannDivision Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4577-715X
Marina ZeldovichDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0172-9904
Ugne KrenzInstitute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0518-8781
Ivana HollowayDepartment of Clinical and Population Sciences, School of Medicine, Leeds Institute for Data Analytics, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Katrin CunitzDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5530-8190
Inga K KoertecBRAIN, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Munich, Germany.
Anna BuchheimDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Christel SalewskiDepartment of Health Psychology, Germany's State Distance-Learning University Hagen, Hagen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5406-3168
Gerard A GioiaDivision of Pediatric Neuropsychology, Safe Concussion Outcome Recovery & Education Program, Children's National Health System, Departments of Pediatrics and Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, George Washington University School of Medicine, Rockville, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Nicole von SteinbuechelDepartment of Psychology, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4143-4713

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescents are at an increased risk of sustaining a traumatic brain injury (TBI), which is associated with physical, cognitive, and/or emotional impairments, the so-called post-concussion symptoms (PCS). To fill the gap of German-language instruments for the age-appropriate assessment of PCS, the current study presents the translation, linguistic validation, and psychometric examination of two versions of the Postconcussion Symptom Inventory (PCSI) for adolescents (PCSI-SR13; 21 items) and their parents (PCSI-P; 20 items). Translation included iterative forward and backward translations and cognitive debriefings (CD). A total of 117 adolescents (aged 13-17 years) after TBI (3 months up to 10 years after injury) and 111 parents completed the PCSI. Both German versions were compared descriptively with the corresponding English versions. Analyses were conducted at the item and scale level. Confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) were performed, and internal consistency was examined using Cronbach's α and McDonald's ω. Convergent validity testing used Spearman's ρ correlations with the Rivermead Post-Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ). Cohen's κ at the item level and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to assess adolescent-parent agreement. The original four-factor structure could be replicated for the PCSI-SR13, but not for the PCSI-P. Internal consistency was good to excellent (≥ 0.80). Correlations (ρ ≥ 0.57) indicated a strong association with the RPQ. At the item level, the adolescent-parent agreement was fair to moderate (κ: 0.14-0.58). At the subscale level, interpretation of the ICC (ICC: 0.51-0.71) was limited due to the wide CI95%. In general, the psychometric properties support the applicability of the PCSI-SR13 and the PCSI-P for assessing PCS in German-speaking adolescents in the subacute and chronic phase after TBI. However, given the lack of factorial validity of the PCSI-P and the discrepancies between adolescents' and parents' ratings, self-report is recommended.

Indexed as

Post-Concussion SyndromePsychometricsSelf ReportAdolescentFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleGermanyHumansMaleParentsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslations

Identifiers

PMID40779503
PMCPMC12333987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.