Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779498›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

MSPA-informed SLEUTH urban growth modeling for green space protection in Ottawa.

Abdolrassoul Salmanmahiny, Scott W Mitchell, Joseph R Bennett

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdolrassoul SalmanmahinyDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5188-7356
Scott W MitchellDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4657-0706
Joseph R BennettGeomatics and Landscape Ecology Research Laboratory, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We created optimal urban expansion scenarios that also safeguard green spaces using SLEUTH-3r in the National Capital Region, Ottawa, Ontario. The scenarios were based on using two exclusion layers in SLEUTH-3r modeling, adjustments to the model's calibrated growth coefficients for a compact city scenario and applying green space social equity weights to urban zones in model's prediction results. The first exclusion layer contained common restricted areas for urban growth, while the second additionally incorporated cores of green spaces defined through Morphological Spatial Pattern Analysis (MSPA), core importance and their corridors for connectivity. For each scenario, we selected 23,850 hectares as the required urban growth by the year 2050 and only 10% of this amount (2385 ha), to encourage more compact growth. We compared the scenarios based on the affected green space cores and urban growth polygons using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). In most cases, scenarios incorporating MSPA were the favored ones. As the first attempt integrating MSPA definition of green space cores, their importance and connectivity into SLEUTH-3r model, we showed that MSPA-informed SLEUTH-3r modeling affects prediction results and provides a useful platform for generating scenarios. Incorporating MSPA information into SLEUTH-3r modeling enhanced the protection of green space cores and their connectivity. However, it also led to the selection of smaller urbanization polygons for the year 2050, distributed across the study area. Focusing on the preferred options, social equity weights and the selected polygons, provides city planners and stakeholders with valuable assistance and flexibility in designing urban growth scenarios while protecting green spaces.

Indexed as

City PlanningConservation of Natural ResourcesParks, RecreationalUrban RenewalModels, TheoreticalOntario

Identifiers

PMID40779498
PMCPMC12334021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.