ArticlePloS one2025
Impact of ventilation and ambient temperature on COVID-19 transmission in clinic waiting rooms: A computational fluid dynamics approach.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic underscores the necessity of understanding the transmission dynamics in enclosed, high-risk environments, such as clinic waiting rooms. This study used computational fluid dynamics (CFD) to investigate the behavior of virus-laden aerosols in clinic waiting rooms under six different scenarios with various temperatures and ventilation setups, offering insights into practical strategies for enhancing safety in healthcare environments. Key findings demonstrated that effective ventilation, through open windows and mechanical systems, can reduce virus-laden aerosol concentrations by up to 99.3% under optimal conditions (e.g., from 5.80 kg/m3 to 0.04 kg/m3By contrast, poorly ventilated scenarios exhibit significantly higher viral concentrations, which can rise as high as 5.80 kg/m3. A novel aspect of this research lies in the comprehensive modeling of human anatomy and aerosol interactions, which enhances the accuracy of viral-trajectory predictions. The practical implications include strategic recommendations for ventilation system design to mitigate transmission risks in clinical settings. These insights provide guidelines for healthcare facility design and emphasize the critical role of environmental control in reducing exposure to airborne pathogens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.