ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Topological and geometric signatures of brain network dynamics in Alzheimer's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Evolving Landscape of Clinical Aging Clocks: From Epigenetic to Multi-Omics Integration.Aging cell · 2026Review
- Olfactory radiomics signatures link pTau217 to cognitive impairment in probable Alzheimer's disease: a multi-cohort machine learning study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Topological and geometric signatures of brain network dynamics in Alzheimer's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThis study explores magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a promising non-invasive approach to monitor Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias. We investigate whether dynamic functional connectivity (dFC), which captures time-varying neural interactions, can reveal sex-specific brain network disruptions in AD that conventional static connectivity analyses may miss.
methodsWe analyzed dFC in the Open Access Series of Imaging Studies (OASIS-3) dataset across three diagnostic groups (normal cognition, mild cognitive impairment, dementia), stratified by sex, and regressed out age. We evaluated group differences using multiple distance metrics sensitive to various aspects of network structure, with statistical significance assessed via permutation testing.
resultsDistinct sex-specific patterns emerged across diagnostic groups, with each metric sensitive to different aspects of network disruption. Peak connectivity states, rather than mean levels, more effectively reflected brain network dynamics. DISCUSSION: By emphasizing network dynamics, our findings highlight promising signatures for early detection and longitudinal biomarkers. Future work will explore metrics tailored to specific demographic or clinical subpopulations. HIGHLIGHTS: Dynamic connectivity reveals sex-specific brain disruptions in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Peak-based analysis improves sensitivity over mean-based connectivity measures. Topological and geometric metrics capture distinct network disruptions by sex. Mild cognitive impairment shows less consistent connectivity changes due to diagnostic instability. Findings support dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) metrics as early AD biomarkers in future studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.