Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779425›Full record

SynthesisAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025

Toward compassionate communication: a rapid review on facilitating the dementia disclosure process.

Alixe Ménard, Emily Clark, Leah Hagerman, Maureen Dobbins, Eric E Smith, Isabelle Vedel, Larry W Chambers, Ngozi Iroanyah, Sobhneek Hothi, Saskia Sivananthan and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Toward compassionate communication: a rapid review on facilitating the dementia disclosure process.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Culturally sensitive CLEAR guidelines on disclosing and communicating a diagnosis of dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Alixe MénardAlzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Emily ClarkNational Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Leah HagermanNational Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Maureen DobbinsNational Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Eric E SmithDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Calgary, 2500 University Dr NW, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Isabelle VedelDepartment of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Larry W ChambersAlzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-8889-2546
Ngozi IroanyahAlzheimer Society of Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sobhneek HothiFaculty of Science, University of Toronto, 27 King's College Cir, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Saskia SivananthanAlzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jhnelle McLaren-BeatoAlzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Sarah MainAlzheimer Society of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

Ministry of Health - Academic Health Science Centre (AHSC) Alternative Funding Plan (AFP) Innovation Fund BMS-20-002Public Health Agency of Canada P004637
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individuals with dementia and their care partners often report dissatisfaction with the disclosure process due to insufficient information and support. Healthcare providers face challenges in effective communication and connecting patients to post-diagnostic resources. To address these issues and emphasize person-centered communication, especially in diverse communities, we conducted a rapid systematic review consolidating preferences for dementia diagnosis disclosure from patients, care partners, and healthcare providers. Searches across MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Emcare (January 2013-February 2023), and gray literature identified 21 relevant articles, including those focusing on Black and Chinese populations. Four themes emerged: (1) setting up appointments, (2) appointment content, (3) overall approach, and (4) cultural competence in dementia disclosure. The Setting, Perception, Invitation, Knowledge, Emotions, and Strategy/Summary (SPIKES)-D tool was noted but lacked real-world evaluations and cultural applicability. Our review highlights the need for tailored tools and standardized guidelines, particularly for culturally competent dementia disclosure practices. HIGHLIGHTS: More than 50% of individuals globally express dissatisfaction with dementia diagnosis disclosure. Primary care providers face significant challenges in communicating dementia diagnoses effectively. Adoption of person-centered approaches is critical in improving dementia disclosure practices.

Indexed as

CaregiversCommunicationDementiaEmpathyTruth DisclosureHealth PersonnelHumanscaregiverscommunicationdementiadisclosurepatient preferences

Identifiers

PMID40779425
PMCPMC12333873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.