Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779267›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

A Digital Therapeutic Intervention for Inpatients With Elevated Suicide Risk: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Craig J Bryan, Patricia Simon, Samuel T Wilkinson, Michael H Allen, Jeremiah Perez, Caleb Adler, Khatiya Moon, Lauren Astorino, Kristen M Carpenter, Luke Misquitta and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05144685 (A Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Digital Therapeutic for Individuals With Suicidal Ideation and/or Suicide Attempts), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05144685 phase2 / phase3terminatednot on this map

A Randomized, Double Blind Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of a Digital Therapeutic for Individuals With Suicidal Ideation and/or Suicide Attempts

TypeinterventionalSponsorOui Therapeutics, Inc.Ran2022 to 2024Enrolled356ConditionsSuicide, Attempted, Suicidal IdeationArmsOTX-202, OTX-000, Treatment as Usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Craig J BryanDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Patricia SimonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Samuel T WilkinsonDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Michael H AllenDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Jeremiah PerezBiostatistics Department, Avania, Marlborough, Massachusetts.
Caleb AdlerDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Khatiya MoonDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.
Lauren AstorinoDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Kristen M CarpenterDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Luke MisquittaDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Katherine BrownloweDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Lauren R KhazemDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Jarrod HayDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Austin G StarkeyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Health, The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus.
Julia TartagliaDepartment of Psychiatry, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, New York.
Helena WinstonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Scott SimpsonDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora.
Alecia D DagerDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
Seth FeuersteinDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

Funding

An Efficacy Trial of a Digital Therapeutic for Suicide PreventionR42MH123357 · NIMH · OUI THERAPEUTICS, INC · PI FEUERSTEIN, SETH, SIMON, PATRICIA · 2021 to 2023
$3.0M
NIMH NIH HHS R42 MH123357
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Suicide is a leading cause of death in the US. Suicide-specific cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) is effective for reducing suicide attempts but is difficult to implement. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a smartphone-based digital therapeutic intervention designed to deliver suicide-focused CBT in reducing suicidal behavior among patients hospitalized for a suicide attempt or suicidal ideation. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multisite, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 6 psychiatric inpatient units across the US. Adult patients admitted with elevated suicide risk from April 2022 to April 2024 were included. Participants completed a baseline assessment and were randomly assigned to either the digital therapeutic group or control application group. The trial was stopped early by the Data Management Safety Board because it surpassed the prespecified futility boundary for the primary end point. Statistical analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. Interventions: The digital therapeutic intervention includes 12 sessions of smartphone-based educational modules (lasting 10-15 minutes each) drawn from CBT for suicide prevention. The active control is a 12-session smartphone-based application that delivers safety planning and psychoeducation about suicide. For both interventions, the first session was completed prior to hospital discharge and the remaining self-paced sessions could be completed after discharge. All participants also received treatment as usual, which included suicide risk assessment, supportive listening, crisis resources, clinician assessment, safety planning, and referral to outpatient treatment. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was time (days) to first actual suicide attempt during follow-up. The secondary end points were change in suicidal ideation from baseline to week 24 (quantified as a change in the Scale for Suicide Ideation total score) and clinician-rated clinical improvement at week 24. The nonprespecified sensitivity analysis end point for suicide attempts was the rate of suicide attempts (actual, aborted, and interrupted). Prespecified subgroup analyses were also conducted to examine treatment effects among patients with vs without prior suicide attempts. Results: A total of 339 participants (mean [SD] age, 27.9 [10.7] years; 224 females [66.1%]) were included. Follow-up data were available from 266 participants (78.5%). Time to first actual suicide attempt, the primary end point, was not significantly different across treatment groups (log-rank χ21 = 3.6; P = .06). Among the 170 participants with prior suicide attempts, nonprespecified sensitivity analyses indicated that the adjusted rate of follow-up suicide attempts was 58.3% lower in the digital therapeutic group than the control application group (0.70 vs 1.68 attempts per person-year; rate ratio [RR], 0.42 [95% CI, 0.18-0.95]; P = .04), and the odds of clinical improvement were higher in the digital therapeutic group than the control application group (97.9% vs 87.5%; odds ratio, 7.59; 95% CI, 1.14-153.62; P = .04). Trajectories of suicidal ideation significantly differed between the digital therapeutic and control application groups (F3,206 = 2.9, P = .04), with decreased suicidal ideation through week 24 in the digital therapeutic group, but in the control application group, suicidal ideation decreased through week 12 and then increased at week 24. Nonprespecified dose-response analyses indicated the suicide attempt rate among patients with a prior suicide attempt decreased by 14.0% for every digital therapeutic module completed (adjusted RR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, the digital therapeutic intervention did not change the time to first actual suicide attempt but helped to sustain reductions in suicidal ideation among inpatients with elevated suicide risk. However, among patients with prior suicide attempts, the digital therapeutic intervention helped reduce recurrent suicide attempts and increased the percentage of inpatients with clinician-rated clinical improvement. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05144685.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyInpatientsMobile ApplicationsSuicide PreventionAdultDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSmartphoneSuicidal IdeationSuicide, Attempted

Identifiers

PMID40779267
PMCPMC12334960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.