Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779256›Full record

ArticleJAMA health forum2025

Easing Cash Assistance Rules and Breastfeeding.

Emily C Dore, Daniel F Collin, David W Rothwell, Rita Hamad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA health forum, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily C DoreDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniel F CollinDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.
David W RothwellHuman Development and Family Sciences, College of Health, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
Rita HamadDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) is a major federal cash assistance program for low-income families, but the program has strict eligibility criteria, meager cash benefits, and cumbersome administrative burdens that limit its effect. However, during the COVID-19 pandemic state TANF programs implemented policy changes to expand program access, including relaxed work requirements and additional income. Few studies have examined the association of these policy changes with health outcomes. Objective: To analyze the association between TANF policy changes during the COVID-19 pandemic and breastfeeding initiation and duration. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study used serial cross-sectional national data from the Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (2017-2020) and a quasi-experimental difference-in-differences analysis to examine whether TANF policy changes affected breastfeeding behaviors among likely TANF participants compared with likely nonparticipants. Multivariable linear regression analyses were conducted that adjusted for individual and state-level covariates. The study was conducted between November 2024 and May 2025. Exposures: Gave birth in a state that implemented TANF policy changes (eg, 1-time cash payments, waiving in-person interviews and work requirements, and extending time limits). Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported measures of whether breastfeeding was initiated and breastfeeding duration in weeks. Results: The sample included 138 700 individuals; the likely TANF participants were less likely to be White (~33%) or married (~37%), were younger (~29% were 20-24 years of age), had lower incomes (~$30 000), and were more likely to have 2 or more previous births (~39%) compared with the likely nonparticipants. The TANF policy changes that expanded eligibility and decreased administrative burdens were associated with increased breastfeeding initiation and duration; eg, waiving sanctions was associated with increased breastfeeding initiation (2.59 percentage points [95% CI, 0.13-5.06 percentage points]) and automatic recertification was associated with increased breastfeeding duration (0.49 weeks [95% CI, 0.04-0.94 weeks]). Providing 1-time cash payments was also associated with increased breastfeeding duration (1 week [95% CI, 0.42-1.58 weeks]). These positive associations were found across all racial and ethnic groups, although some 95% CIs included the null. Conclusions and Relevance: In this quasi-experimental study, state TANF policies that expanded eligibility, increased cash payments, and decreased administrative burdens were associated with increased breastfeeding initiation and duration. These findings inform active policymaking on antipoverty policies.

Indexed as

Breast FeedingCOVID-19PovertyPublic AssistanceAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40779256
PMCPMC12334963

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.