Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779170›Full record

ArticleInternational orthopaedics2025

Waste in orthopaedic surgery; an application of the healthcare sustainability mode and effect analysis.

Isabella C Klarenbeek, Esther R C Janssen, Paul C Willems, Okke F Lambers Heerspink, Anne C van der Eijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Isabella C KlarenbeekDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Viecuri Medisch Centrum, Venlo, Netherlands. isabella.klarenbeek@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-2980-8607
Esther R C JanssenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Viecuri Medisch Centrum, Venlo, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4631-696X
Paul C WillemsDepartment of Orthopaedics and Research School Caphri, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Okke F Lambers HeerspinkDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Viecuri Medisch Centrum, Venlo, Netherlands.
Anne C van der EijkOperating Room Department and Central Sterile Supply Department, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6565-6874

Funding

Sciencefund VieCuri Medical Center E.22.32.001-4)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOperating theatres generate a lot of waste and as such are a major contributor to the rise of negative environmental impact of hospitals. Thus reducing operating room waste is an essential strategy for hospitals to reduce their environmental impact and contribute to a healthier environment. This study aims to quantify waste from six common orthopaedic procedures and identify potential strategies for reduction.

methodsThe Healthcare Sustainability Mode and Effect Analysis (HSMEA) is a method to assess the environmental impact of waste. It is a systematic approach to analyse waste, calculate the environmental impact and identify strategies to reduce this impact. In this study an HSMEA of operating room waste of 18 orthopaedic procedures was performed: open and percutaneous spinal fusion (n = 6), unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty (n = 6), reverse shoulder arthroplasty (n = 3) and total hip arthroplasty (n = 3). For each type of waste, the strategies of the 6R methodology were considered to reduce the environmental impact of the operating theatre department.

resultsThe weight of the waste of orthopaedic procedures ranged between 6.35 and 8.30 kg. About 70% of the total waste was plastic. The environmental impact of measured orthopaedic procedures ranged between 19.14 and 23.96 kg CO2-eq. The impact of the six orthopaedic procedures could be reduced with 10.3 to 13.9 kg CO2-eq. using the 6R methodology.

conclusionThe environmental impact of waste from orthopaedic procedures is substantial and can be reduced up to 63%. Applying the HSMEA method to all procedures in the operating theatres can lead to a significant reduction of the carbon footprint of hospitals.

Indexed as

Medical WasteMedical Waste DisposalOperating RoomsOrthopedic ProceduresHumansMedical WasteMedical Waste DisposalArthroplastyEnvironmental sustainabilityHospital waste reductionLife Cycle AssessmentOperation roomOrthopaedicPlanetary healthWaste analysisWaste assessment

Identifiers

PMID40779170
PMCPMC12488813

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.