ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Functional patterns of healthy human respiratory dynamics by 3D MR spirometry.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of Signal- and Volume-Based Ventilation-Weighted Assessment Using 3D FLORET UTE MRI in Patients With Various Pulmonary Disease.Magnetic resonance in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFunctional pulmonary MRI can assess the pathophysiology of regional ventilation, provided that nominal ventilatory patterns are characterised as a baseline. This study investigates common features and their associated gravity dependence using 3D MR spirometry in freely breathing healthy volunteers. MATERIALS AND
methodsRepeated dynamic lung MR acquisitions were performed at 3 T on 25 healthy volunteers breathing freely in the supine and prone positions. Three-dimensional maps of tidal volumes (TV), peak expiratory flows (SPEF), expiratory flows at 25% of tidal volume (SEF25), and anisotropy deformation index (ADI) were inferred and normalised. Intra- and inter-volunteer reproducibility was evaluated using percentage differences (PD) and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), while gravity dependence was tested using a paired Wilcoxon test.
resultsTwenty-five volunteers (mean age, 45 years ± 17 [standard deviation]; 15 males) were included. Respiratory parametric maps are found spatially inhomogeneous throughout each volunteer's lung, with large coefficients of variation ranging between 30 and 63%. Yet, the main respiratory patterns are shared among volunteers with common features primarily governed by lung gravity dependence for TV, SPEF, and SEF25 (p < 0.05). Spirometry biomarkers are globally repeatable despite intrinsic physiological variabilities (median PD: 5.7-9.2%, ICC: 0.71-0.88), and fairly repeatable locally after normalisations (median PD: 11-19%, ICC: 0.78-0.90).
conclusion3D MR spirometry exhibits shared respiratory features between individuals with gravity dependence. Intra-volunteer repeatability and global accuracy were found, demonstrating the reliability of the technique. A new baseline is established for regional lung pathophysiology. KEY POINTS: Question Nominal ventilatory patterns in free breathing need to be characterised for regional pathophysiology. Findings Functional ventilatory maps showed significant inhomogeneity, but key patterns, primarily governed by gravity, were consistent across subjects. 3D MR spirometry demonstrated reliability despite physiological variability. Clinical relevance 3D MR spirometry is a reliable technique for absolute quantification of the regional ventilation and its dynamic. Nominal spatial patterns of the ventilation should be considered for assessing regional pathophysiology in free breathing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.