ArticleSkeletal radiology2025
Optimizing contrast timing in photon-counting detector CT for the assessment of peripheral arthritis.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodality imaging considerations for genicular artery embolization in knee osteoarthritis.World journal of radiology · 2026Review
- CT of Soft Tissue Infections: Current and Future Perspectives from Diagnosis to Treatment.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Ultrasound microvascular flow imaging and photon counting computed tomography support the diagnosis and assist in treatment monitoring of canine erosive immune mediated polyarthropathy: a case report.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivePhoton-counting detector CT (PCD-CT) allows for iodine mapping of inflamed tissues in peripheral immune-mediated arthritis, supporting diagnosis and disease activity assessment. This study aims to identify the optimal timing for image acquisition after intravenous iodinated contrast administration to maximize enhancement and contrast with surrounding tissues.
methodsHigh-resolution PCD-CT scans of bilateral wrist-hand regions were obtained from 26 patients with peripheral arthritis, both native and post-contrast (1 ml/kg intravenous iodinated contrast at 2.5 ml/sec flow) at 120-, 180-, and 240-s delay phases. Iodine maps were constructed from spectral data. Phases were compared based on densities and iodine concentrations measured in synovial, tenosynovial, and periungual tissues, with muscle, fat, and vessels as controls. We used descriptive statistics and mixed-effects linear regression inferential models for the comparisons. Synovitis and tenosynovitis were verified by ultrasound measurements.
resultsNo significant differences (p > 0.05) were found in iodine concentration or density across the 120-, 180-, and 240-s post-contrast phases in inflamed synovial, tenosynovial, and periungual soft tissues. Inflamed tissues showed significant and consistent differences in iodine concentration from muscle and fat (p < 0.0001) across all phases, while the greatest differentiation from vessels was in the 120-s phase. The effective dose was identical across all post-contrast phases (0.028 ± 0.0035 mSv).
conclusionIodine uptake in inflamed tissues was identical across all three post-contrast phases. However, the 120-s phase offered the highest contrast between inflammation and surrounding vascular structures while minimizing scan time, supporting its use for standardized follow-up imaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.