ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025
GAN-MRI enhanced multi-organ MRI segmentation: a deep learning perspective.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a high-resolution tool widely used for detailed anatomical imaging. However, prolonged scan times often lead to motion artefacts and patient discomfort. Fast acquisition techniques can reduce scan times but often produce noisy, low-contrast images, compromising segmentation accuracy essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. To address these limitations, we developed an end-to-end framework that incorporates BIDS-based data organiser and anonymizer, a GAN-based MR image enhancement model (GAN-MRI), AssemblyNet for brain region segmentation, and an attention-residual U-Net with Guided loss for abdominal and thigh segmentation. Thirty brain scans (5,400 slices) and 32 abdominal (1,920 slices) and 55 thigh scans (2,200 slices) acquired from multiple MRI scanners (GE, Siemens, Toshiba) underwent evaluation. Image quality improved significantly, with SNR and CNR for brain scans increasing from 28.44 to 42.92 (p < 0.001) and 11.88 to 18.03 (p < 0.001), respectively. Abdominal scans exhibited SNR increases from 35.30 to 50.24 (p < 0.001) and CNR from 10,290.93 to 93,767.22 (p < 0.001). Double-blind evaluations highlighted improved visualisations of anatomical structures and bias field correction. Segmentation performance improved substantially in the thigh (muscle: + 21%, IMAT: + 9%) and abdominal regions (SSAT: + 1%, DSAT: + 2%, VAT: + 12%), while brain segmentation metrics remained largely stable, reflecting the robustness of the baseline model. Proposed framework is designed to handle data from multiple anatomies with variations from different MRI scanners and centres by enhancing MRI scan and improving segmentation accuracy, diagnostic precision and treatment planning while reducing scan times and maintaining patient comfort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40779148What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.