Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40779148›Full record

ArticleRadiological physics and technology2025

GAN-MRI enhanced multi-organ MRI segmentation: a deep learning perspective.

Arvind Channarayapatna Srinivasa, Seema S Bhat, Dikendra Baduwal, Zheng Ting Jordan Sim, Shamshekhar S Patil, Ashwin Amarapur, K N Bhanu Prakash

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Arvind Channarayapatna SrinivasaBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Republic of Singapore. arvindcs@bii.a-star.edu.sg.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6102-1636
Seema S BhatAikenist Technologies Pvt. Ltd, 10th Main Road, 22nd Cross Rd, 3rd Block East, Jayanagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560011, India.
Dikendra BaduwalVel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R and D Institute of Science and Technology, No.42, Avadi-Vel Tech Road, Vel Nagar, Avadi, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, 600062, India.
Zheng Ting Jordan SimDepartment of Diagnostic Radiology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, 11 Jln Tan Tock Seng, Singapore, 308433, Singapore.
Shamshekhar S PatilDepartment of Computer Science, Dr. Ambedkar Institute of Technology, Outer Ring Rd, Near Gnana Bharathi, 2nd Stage, Naagarabhaavi, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560056, India.
Ashwin AmarapurAikenist Technologies Pvt. Ltd, 10th Main Road, 22nd Cross Rd, 3rd Block East, Jayanagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560011, India.
K N Bhanu PrakashBioinformatics Institute, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A*STAR), 30 Biopolis Street, #07-01 Matrix, Singapore, 138671, Republic of Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a high-resolution tool widely used for detailed anatomical imaging. However, prolonged scan times often lead to motion artefacts and patient discomfort. Fast acquisition techniques can reduce scan times but often produce noisy, low-contrast images, compromising segmentation accuracy essential for diagnosis and treatment planning. To address these limitations, we developed an end-to-end framework that incorporates BIDS-based data organiser and anonymizer, a GAN-based MR image enhancement model (GAN-MRI), AssemblyNet for brain region segmentation, and an attention-residual U-Net with Guided loss for abdominal and thigh segmentation. Thirty brain scans (5,400 slices) and 32 abdominal (1,920 slices) and 55 thigh scans (2,200 slices) acquired from multiple MRI scanners (GE, Siemens, Toshiba) underwent evaluation. Image quality improved significantly, with SNR and CNR for brain scans increasing from 28.44 to 42.92 (p < 0.001) and 11.88 to 18.03 (p < 0.001), respectively. Abdominal scans exhibited SNR increases from 35.30 to 50.24 (p < 0.001) and CNR from 10,290.93 to 93,767.22 (p < 0.001). Double-blind evaluations highlighted improved visualisations of anatomical structures and bias field correction. Segmentation performance improved substantially in the thigh (muscle: + 21%, IMAT: + 9%) and abdominal regions (SSAT: + 1%, DSAT: + 2%, VAT: + 12%), while brain segmentation metrics remained largely stable, reflecting the robustness of the baseline model. Proposed framework is designed to handle data from multiple anatomies with variations from different MRI scanners and centres by enhancing MRI scan and improving segmentation accuracy, diagnostic precision and treatment planning while reducing scan times and maintaining patient comfort.

Indexed as

Deep LearningGalliumImage EnhancementImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMagnetic Resonance ImagingAbdomenBrainHumansSignal-To-Noise RatioThighGalliumAttention-residual U-netDeep learningGenerative adversarial networks (GAN)Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Quick scan

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.