SynthesisThe international journal of cardiovascular imaging2026
Impact of mitral regurgitation severity on thromboembolic risk in atrial fibrillation: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in The international journal of cardiovascular imaging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with a heightened risk of thromboembolic events (TE). Whether severe mitral regurgitation (MR) has a protective effect against thrombus formation in AF remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MR severity on thromboembolic risk in patients with AF. This systematic review with meta-analysis included data from eight studies, from 1998 to 2022. All studies reported the prevalence of TE according to MR severity, in patients with non-valvular AF, defined as the absence of prosthetic/repaired mitral valve or moderate or more severe mitral stenosis. TE was defined as stroke, transient ischemic attack, another arterial embolic event, or presence of thrombus in the left atrium. Eight studies with a total of 21,821 patients (54% male, mean age 70 ± 11 years) were identified. The overall prevalence of TE was 6.0%. No significant difference was observed in the prevalence of TE based on MR severity (no or mild MR: 5.9%, moderate or more severe MR: 6.8%, odds ratio: 1.11, 95% confidence interval: 0.77-1.73, p = 0.64). When specifically examining studies that exclusively reported either embolic or thrombotic events, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence rates of events observed across the different categories of MR severity. Our analysis found no significant association between MR severity and the risk for TE, in patients with non-valvular AF. This suggests that MR may not be a determining factor for thromboembolic risk in this population.Clinical Trial registration (PROSPERO) CRD42024504403.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.