ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2025
Pioneering telesurgery in gynecology: the first European case of total hysterectomy.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Remote robot-assisted renal surgery: a systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis of real-world evidence.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Early clinical experience with the Toumai robotic system in general surgery: a systematic review of short-term outcomes and telesurgical applications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Clinical application of robotic telesurgery in the Brazilian public health system: a consecutive case series.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- Feasibility of robotic telesurgery over wired and private 5 G networks within Brazil's public health system (SUS): a pilot study.Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil) · 2026Article
- The first total robotic-assisted lymphovenous anastomosis: prospects for innovation and future development.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2026Article
- Minimally invasive surgery (robot-assisted or laparoscopic) versus open surgery for presumed benign ovarian tumours.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This report describes the first European clinical case of robot-assisted telesurgery in gynecology using the Toumai® Endoscopic Surgery System. A 34-year-old woman with recurrent cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia underwent a total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy. The procedure was performed remotely between two institutions in Belgium, approximately 20 km apart. The remote surgeon operated from a dedicated console, while the patient and the surgical team were on site. The operation was completed successfully without intraoperative complications or conversion. Total operative time was 74 min, with a console time of 47 min. The mean latency was 20 ms with a jitter < 10 ms, with high image quality and no connection issues. Postoperative recovery was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 2. At the 18-day follow-up, no complications were observed. Subjective feedback highlighted a high level of satisfaction among the patient and surgical staff, with the remote surgeon reporting a slightly reduced sense of control, mitigated by the on-site stand-by surgeon. Poor audio quality was noted as a minor issue. This first experience confirms that telesurgery in gynecology is technically feasible and safe, even using a standard network connection. Although further improvements and larger studies are needed, this experience supports telesurgery as a promising tool to expand access to expert surgical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.