ArticleBreast cancer research and treatment2025
Carboplatin, gemcitabine, and mifepristone for advanced breast and recurrent/persistent epithelial ovarian cancer.
Article in Breast cancer research and treatment, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychological Stress Promotes Tumor Growth in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Models Through Myeloid Signaling.Cancer science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposePreclinical models of glucocorticoid receptor (GR)-positive breast cancer (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC) suggest GR activity inhibits chemotherapy-induced apoptosis, and GR antagonism using mifepristone (Mif) enhances cytotoxicity. We performed a phase I trial combining mifepristone, carboplatin (C), gemcitabine (G).
methodsA standard "3 + 3" dose escalation scheme was used. Objectives were safety and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Mif + CG. CG was administered intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle, and mifepristone was administered orally the day before and day of chemotherapy.
resultsThirty-one patients enrolled with a median age of 54 years; the median prior metastatic regimens were one. Twenty-five patients were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) including 16 BC and 9 OC. Dose was de-escalated to dose level (DL) -1 due to 2/4 neutropenia-related DLT's. DLT definition was updated to exclude hematologic DLTs starting at DL-1. The dose was further de-escalated due to neutropenia, and 2/3, 1/4 and 0/6 patients experienced a DLT at DL-1, DL-2, and DL-3, respectively. At DL-1, prophylactic pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) was instituted. Dose levels -1 and -2 were expanded to add 3 and 6 patients, respectively, to evaluate tolerability in dose levels -1a and -2a. There were 3 major responses (1CR, 2PR) at DL1, and 1 CR at DL-1. No responses were observed at lower levels.
conclusionThe MTD was carboplatin AUC 2 + gemcitabine 600 mg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.