ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2025
The Knowledge Gap: A Survey of Pelvic Floor Understanding Amongst Gynaecology Trainees in Ireland.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisPelvic floor dysfunction (PFD) significantly impacts women's health, yet its assessment and management remain inconsistently covered in Obstetrics and Gynaecology training. This study evaluates the knowledge and training exposure of Obstetrics and Gynaecology trainees in Ireland regarding PFD, identifying gaps and potential areas for improvement.
methodsA cross-sectional survey-based study included all non-consultant hospital doctors (NCHDs). An anonymous electronic survey was distributed assessing respondent demographics and their training exposure and knowledge of pelvic floor dysfunction through 25 structured questions. Sub-analyses were conducted to explore associations between participant characteristics and knowledge scores. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and Spearman's correlation were used for data analysis.
resultsOf 113 respondents, 109 (96.5%) participated. The median knowledge score was 14/25 (IQR 0-16), with a mean of 9.32. Years since graduation positively correlated with knowledge scores (Spearman's ρ = 0.66, p = 0.05). Higher scores were associated with participation in higher specialty training (15 vs. 7, p < 0.01), exposure to urogynaecology clinics (15 vs. 12, p < 0.01), and operative urogynaecology (15 vs. 3, p < 0.01). Participants with a specific interest in urogynaecology or general/ambulatory gynaecology achieved higher scores (15 vs. 12, p = 0.04).
conclusionsWide variability in knowledge and training exposure in pelvic floor dysfunction was identified amongst trainees. Structured programmes emphasizing urogynaecology could enhance trainee competency, ensuring improved understanding and management of pelvic floor dysfunction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40778982What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.