Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778937›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Optimising reaction-time analysis in eye movement perimetry using pooled promptness distributions.

Ashwini Venkat Reddy Chanakya, Peter Bremen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Reversibly Desensitising the Human Retina to Delay Saccadic Reaction Time for Diagnostic Prototyping.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  3. Optimising reaction-time analysis in eye movement perimetry using pooled promptness distributions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ashwini Venkat Reddy ChanakyaDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0151-4578
Peter BremenDepartment of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1709-6224

Funding

Oogfonds 2022-12Stichting Lijf en Leven 74_P.Bremen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reaction-time measurements play a crucial role in assessing cognitive and sensory processing, with applications in functional clinical diagnostics such as eye-movement perimetry (EMP) for the detection of glaucoma. However, reaction-time distributions are typically right-skewed, complicating statistical analysis and requiring large numbers of repetitions for reliable parameter estimation. One well-known transformation to normalise reaction-time distributions is taking their reciprocal, called 'speed' or 'promptness' (unit 1/s). Using the promptness transformation for individual visual-field locations typically normalises the corresponding reaction-time distributions and enables more efficient statistical analysis. This study investigated whether pooling promptness across visual-field locations maintains sufficient normality for robust parameter estimation, even with sparse data typical of clinical applications, such as EMP. The results demonstrate that pooled promptness distributions generally retain normal-like properties in normal vision and glaucoma, allowing for efficient estimation of key distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation) with a minimal number of repetitions. These findings suggest that promptness-based metrics could serve as clinically relevant summary indices for visual-function assessment, similar to mean deviation (MD) in standard perimetry. While the reciprocal transformation of reaction time is well established, its targeted application in visual-field analysis via EMP and the robustness to pooling across stimulus conditions, that is, visual-field locations, has not been explored systematically. This study shows that promptness enables compact, interpretable metrics for EMP, even with sparse data. By reducing data collection demands while preserving statistical rigour, this approach offers a promising framework for enhancing the efficiency and applicability of EMP in clinical and research settings.

Indexed as

Eye MovementsGlaucomaReaction TimeVisual FieldsVisual Field TestsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle Agedglaucomaretinasaccadesvisual fieldvisual‐field deficit

Identifiers

PMID40778937
PMCPMC12682101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.