ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025
Optimising reaction-time analysis in eye movement perimetry using pooled promptness distributions.
Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Saccadic Reaction Times and Computational Modelling Reveal Heterogeneous Binocular Summation in Glaucomatous Visual Fields.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Reversibly Desensitising the Human Retina to Delay Saccadic Reaction Time for Diagnostic Prototyping.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026Article
- Optimising reaction-time analysis in eye movement perimetry using pooled promptness distributions.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Reaction-time measurements play a crucial role in assessing cognitive and sensory processing, with applications in functional clinical diagnostics such as eye-movement perimetry (EMP) for the detection of glaucoma. However, reaction-time distributions are typically right-skewed, complicating statistical analysis and requiring large numbers of repetitions for reliable parameter estimation. One well-known transformation to normalise reaction-time distributions is taking their reciprocal, called 'speed' or 'promptness' (unit 1/s). Using the promptness transformation for individual visual-field locations typically normalises the corresponding reaction-time distributions and enables more efficient statistical analysis. This study investigated whether pooling promptness across visual-field locations maintains sufficient normality for robust parameter estimation, even with sparse data typical of clinical applications, such as EMP. The results demonstrate that pooled promptness distributions generally retain normal-like properties in normal vision and glaucoma, allowing for efficient estimation of key distribution parameters (mean and standard deviation) with a minimal number of repetitions. These findings suggest that promptness-based metrics could serve as clinically relevant summary indices for visual-function assessment, similar to mean deviation (MD) in standard perimetry. While the reciprocal transformation of reaction time is well established, its targeted application in visual-field analysis via EMP and the robustness to pooling across stimulus conditions, that is, visual-field locations, has not been explored systematically. This study shows that promptness enables compact, interpretable metrics for EMP, even with sparse data. By reducing data collection demands while preserving statistical rigour, this approach offers a promising framework for enhancing the efficiency and applicability of EMP in clinical and research settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.