Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40778761›Full record

ArticleOperative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.)2026

Endoscopic Endonasal Approach for Craniopharyngiomas With Intraventricular Extension: Anatomic-Clinical Considerations and Surgical Outcomes in a Series of 61 Patients.

Ilaria Bove, Domenico Solari, Teresa Somma, Riccardo Nocini, Carmela Palmiero, Felice Esposito, Paolo Cappabianca, Luigi Maria Cavallo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Operative neurosurgery (Hagerstown, Md.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ilaria BoveDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.
Domenico SolariDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1535-8737
Teresa SommaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.
Riccardo NociniUnit of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Department, University of Verona, Verona , Italy.
Carmela PalmieroDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.
Felice EspositoDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.
Paolo CappabiancaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.
Luigi Maria CavalloDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Universita' degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples , Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectivesCraniopharyngiomas (CPs) with intraventricular extension has required often a difficult surgical management. These injuries involve a high degree of endocrinological, visual, and neuropsychological morbidities, which have a huge impact on the patient's quality of life. The advancements of visualization instruments along with development of minimally invasive techniques as the endoscopic endonasal have granted reduction of morbidity and mortality rates. The aim of this retrospective study was to report our experience with the endoscopic endonasal approach in the management of a series of patients affected by CPs with intraventricular extension.

methodsThe authors reviewed data of 61 cases from a series of 164 patients, who underwent an endoscopic endonasal transtuberculum/transplanum approach for the removal of a CP involving the third ventricle between January 2001 and March 2023. Four main third ventricular growth patterns were identified: stalk-infundibulum, infundibulum-ventricular chamber, stalk-infundibulum-ventricular chamber, and ventricular chamber.

resultsSixty-one patients (34 men, 27 women), with mean age of 51.87 years (range 10-79 years ± 13.66 SD), underwent extended endoscopic endonasal approach. Gross total resection was obtained in 65.6% of cases and resulted significantly influenced by the sex (95% CI, 0.080-0.60; P = .02), previous treatment (95% CI, 0.08-0.31; P = .04), and tumor location (95% CI, 0.44-0.10; P = .05). Postoperatively, visual improvement was observed in 40 patients (76.9%). The hypothalamic functions were improved in 6 cases (20%), remained stable in 9 (45%), instead a new-onset of hypothalamic functions disturbances were registered in 5 cases on 31 patients (16.1%). Six postoperative cerebrospinal fluid leaks (9.8%) occurred.

conclusionThe different topographies of intraventricular CPs affect the outcomes of resection. However, the extension of CP in the third ventricle does not represent a limit of the endonasal route; the good outcomes and limited complications confirm that.

Indexed as

CraniopharyngiomaNeuroendoscopyPituitary NeoplasmsThird VentricleAdolescentAdultAgedChildFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNatural Orifice Endoscopic SurgeryRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultCraniopharyngiomaEndoscopic endonasal approachHypothalamusThird ventricleTranstuberculum/transplanum endoscopic endonasal approach

Identifiers

PMID40778761
PMCPMC13068443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.