ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2025
Adaptive Optics and Multimodal Retinal Imaging for Postoperative Evaluation in Patients With Epiretinal Membrane.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of a Retinal Phantom to Facilitate Adaptive Optics Scanning Light Ophthalmoscopy Imaging in a Multicenter Clinical Trial.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate adaptive optics scanning laser ophthalmoscope (AO-SLO) features and identify their multimodal retinal imaging characteristics using AO-SLO, swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT), and color fundus photography in patients undergoing surgery for epiretinal membrane (ERM), and to provide valuable insights into the mechanism underlying postoperative ERM progression. Methods: Patients with ERM underwent multimodal retinal imaging following surgery, including color fundus photography, SS-OCT, and AO-SLO. AO-SLO features were characterized, and their corresponding multimodal retinal imaging findings were analyzed. Results: Seventeen eyes from 17 postoperative ERM patients were included in this pilot study (mean age [SD], 68.06 [8.26] years; 12 female [70.6%]). Seven categories of AO-SLO features were identified in patients with ERM after surgery. The most common features were granular membrane (n = 17 [100%]), waxy membrane (n = 12 [70.6%]), and microcysts (n = 12 [70.6%]), after dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (n = 11 [64.7%]), microfolds (n = 6 [35.3%]), punctate reflectivity (n = 6 [35.3%]), and retinal folds (n = 5 [29.4%]). Conclusions: AO-SLO imaging provides detailed insights into retinal microstructural changes after surgery for ERM. Further longitudinal studies tracking AO-SLO features over time and integrating multimodal retinal imaging modalities could enhance our understanding of retinal restoration processes and improve the prediction of surgical outcomes in ERM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.