ArticleEpilepsia open2025
General mental ability (Spearman's g) in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.
Article in Epilepsia open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- General mental ability (Spearman's g) in Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy.Epilepsia open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo: (a) interrogate the concept of general mental ability reflected by "Spearman's g" factor in participants with Juvenile Myoclonic Epilepsy (JME) and control participants; (b) understand g's clinical, familial, socioeconomic, and brain structural correlates; and (c) determine g's relationship with variable cognitive pathology in JME and the neuroanatomical correlates of association.
methodsSeventy-seven JME and 43 typically developing unrelated control participants (mean ages 19.7 and 20.3 years, respectively) were administered a comprehensive neuropsychological battery with characterization of clinical epilepsy and familial features, determination of socioeconomic status, and structural neuroimaging. g was estimated through factor analysis and compared between participant groups, related to familial social factors (marital status, level of education, work status), socioeconomic environment (Area Deprivation Index), and brain morphological features (total intracranial volume [TIV], cortical and subcortical volumes, and cortical thickness). High and low cognitive reserve groups were defined by g and interrogated in a similar fashion.
resultsGeneral mental ability (g) was significantly lower in JME than in controls and associated with a lower level of paternal education, greater disadvantage, smaller TIV and cortical and subcortical volumes, as well as with disruption of age-appropriate cortical thinning in bifrontal lateral and medial regions. JME high and low g groups exhibited significantly different cognitive and academic profiles compared to controls, as well as to each other, with differences in familial and socioeconomic factors, as well as in brain morphological characteristics, all less favorable in the low compared to high g JME group. High g JME participants showed few differences compared to controls. SIGNIFICANCE: g is lower in JME than control participants and linked with definable features of familial and sociodemographic environment, as well as brain morphological patterns. g appears to provide an effective metric to characterize so-called reserve for overall cognitive and academic function with associated brain structural features, notably the presence/absence of age-appropriate cortical thinning in bifrontal regions. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: General mental ability, or g, is an important aspect of a person's cognitive ability. We found g to be lower in JME patients compared to controls and to be linked to features of their family, neighborhood, and brain. The protective effects of g could be shown by dividing participants into high and low g groups. High g participants exhibited few differences compared to controls, while, in contrast, low g participants showed poorer cognition, school performance, came from deprived neighborhoods, and had more problematic family features. Importantly, lower g was linked to measures of the brain, suggesting slowed neurodevelopment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.