ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
Current State of Pharmacogenomic Implementation Into Care for Persons With Cystic Fibrosis.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cystic fibrosis (CF) was once a fatal disease of childhood, but with advances in combination CFTR modulator therapies, life expectancy for persons with CF (PwCF) has increased. Despite remarkable improvements in life expectancy, CF is a chronic multiple organ system disease and comorbidities characterized by recurrent respiratory infections, pancreatic insufficiency, diabetes, liver disease, depression, anxiety, and bone disease resulting in exposure to many drugs. The Clinical Pharmacogenetics (PGx) Implementation Consortium (CPIC) publishes evidence-based guidelines for use of PGx to guide dosing for drug-gene interactions. This study aimed to assess the current use of PGx testing in CF care at CF Foundation-accredited care centers and affiliate programs (CFF-ACCAP) across the United States. A 14-item survey was distributed electronically to CF Foundation-accredited care centers and affiliate programs in the United States using the CF Foundation email exchange. Overall, 74 responses were received from a potential of the 287 CFF-ACCAP. Since each individual CFF-ACCAP may have had multiple team members who could have received and responded to the survey, it is possible that these responses include multiple respondents from a single center. Only eight (4%) respondents affirmed they were obtaining PGx testing beyond cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) and 66 (89%) respondents answered that they were not currently doing PGx for drug-gene pairs beyond CFTR. Based on this landscape survey, PGx is not commonly implemented in US CFF-ACCAP, but providers are open to using PGx to improve care in PwCF. Several barriers limit the implementation of PGx in CFF-ACCAP, which calls for guidance on how to effectively integrate PGx into CF clinical care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.