ArticleJournal of clinical periodontology2025
Does Early Re-Entry Surgery Following Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration Compromise the Dimension of Peri-Implant Tissues?
Article in Journal of clinical periodontology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Does Early Re-Entry Surgery Following Simultaneous Guided Bone Regeneration Compromise the Dimension of Peri-Implant Tissues?Journal of clinical periodontology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate whether early re-entry surgery following simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) and implant placement has a negative impact on the outcome of bone regeneration and osseointegration. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn the edentulous mandible of six mongrel dogs, buccal peri-implant dehiscence defects were surgically created. Bone-level implants were placed with GBR, followed by submerged healing. Two experimental groups were randomly assigned according to the timing of re-entry and healing abutment connection at 2 months (early group) and 4 months (late group) following GBR. All animals were euthanised 5 months after GBR for histological analysis.
resultsOne implant in the late group failed as a result of fibrin incarceration. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding new bone area (1.98 mm
conclusionEarly second-stage surgery results in similar bone regeneration, osseointegration and mucosal dimensions as late abutment connection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.